Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38877097›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Development of a real-time cattle lameness detection system using a single side-view camera.

Bo Bo Myint, Tsubasa Onizuka, Pyke Tin, Masaru Aikawa, Ikuo Kobayashi, Thi Thi Zin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Bo Bo MyintGraduate School of Engineering, University of Miyazaki, Miyazaki, 889-2192, Japan.
Tsubasa OnizukaGraduate School of Engineering, University of Miyazaki, Miyazaki, 889-2192, Japan.
Pyke TinGraduate School of Engineering, University of Miyazaki, Miyazaki, 889-2192, Japan.
Masaru AikawaOrganization for Learning and Student Development, University of Miyazaki, Miyazaki, 889-2192, Japan.
Ikuo KobayashiSumiyoshi Livestock Science Station, Field Science Center, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Miyazaki, Miyazaki, 889-0121, Japan.
Thi Thi ZinGraduate School of Engineering, University of Miyazaki, Miyazaki, 889-2192, Japan. thithi@cc.miyazaki-u.ac.jp.

Funding

JKA through its promotion funds from KEIRIN RACE 2023M-425
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advancements in machine learning and deep learning have revolutionized various computer vision applications, including object detection, tracking, and classification. This research investigates the application of deep learning for cattle lameness detection in dairy farming. Our study employs image processing techniques and deep learning methods for cattle detection, tracking, and lameness classification. We utilize two powerful object detection algorithms: Mask-RCNN from Detectron2 and the popular YOLOv8. Their performance is compared to identify the most effective approach for this application. Bounding boxes are drawn around detected cattle to assign unique local IDs, enabling individual tracking and isolation throughout the video sequence. Additionally, mask regions generated by the chosen detection algorithm provide valuable data for feature extraction, which is crucial for subsequent lameness classification. The extracted cattle mask region values serve as the basis for feature extraction, capturing relevant information indicative of lameness. These features, combined with the local IDs assigned during tracking, are used to compute a lameness score for each cattle. We explore the efficacy of various established machine learning algorithms, such as Support Vector Machines (SVM), AdaBoost and so on, in analyzing the extracted lameness features. Evaluation of the proposed system was conducted across three key domains: detection, tracking, and lameness classification. Notably, the detection module employing Detectron2 achieved an impressive accuracy of 98.98%. Similarly, the tracking module attained a high accuracy of 99.50%. In lameness classification, AdaBoost emerged as the most effective algorithm, yielding the highest overall average accuracy (77.9%). Other established machine learning algorithms, including Decision Trees (DT), Support Vector Machines (SVM), and Random Forests, also demonstrated promising performance (DT: 75.32%, SVM: 75.20%, Random Forest: 74.9%). The presented approach demonstrates the successful implementation for cattle lameness detection. The proposed system has the potential to revolutionize dairy farm management by enabling early lameness detection and facilitating effective monitoring of cattle health. Our findings contribute valuable insights into the application of advanced computer vision methods for livestock health management.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsCattle DiseasesLameness, AnimalSupport Vector MachineAnimalsCattleDeep LearningImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMachine LearningVideo Recording

Identifiers

PMID38877097
PMCPMC11178932

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.