ArticleScientific reports2024
Development of a real-time cattle lameness detection system using a single side-view camera.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Robust multi-class lumpy skin disease diagnosis for practical livestock applications.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Computer Vision for Cattle Health and Welfare Monitoring: A Comprehensive Review of Methods, Applications, and Interdisciplinary Integration in Smart Agriculture.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Integrated approaches for lameness control in free-stall dairy systems under heat stress and water scarcity.Tropical animal health and production · 2026Review
- Multimodal animal health monitoring in extensive livestock production systems.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Review
- Direct video-based spatiotemporal deep learning for cattle lameness detection.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Improving bovine disease detection through multilabel classification.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Computer Vision in Dairy Farm Management: A Literature Review of Current Applications and Future Perspectives.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Review
- Automatic cattle identification system based on color point cloud using hybrid PointNet++ Siamese network.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Accuracy of Detecting Degrees of Lameness in Individual Dairy Cattle Within a Herd Using Single and Multiple Changes in Behavior and Gait.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Application of Infrared Thermography in the Detection of Hoof Disease and Lameness in Cattle.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Review
- Comparison of machine learning and validation methods for high-dimensional accelerometer data to detect foot lesions in dairy cattle.PloS one · 2025Article
- refineDLC: An advanced post-processing pipeline for DeepLabCut outputs.Biology methods & protocols · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recent advancements in machine learning and deep learning have revolutionized various computer vision applications, including object detection, tracking, and classification. This research investigates the application of deep learning for cattle lameness detection in dairy farming. Our study employs image processing techniques and deep learning methods for cattle detection, tracking, and lameness classification. We utilize two powerful object detection algorithms: Mask-RCNN from Detectron2 and the popular YOLOv8. Their performance is compared to identify the most effective approach for this application. Bounding boxes are drawn around detected cattle to assign unique local IDs, enabling individual tracking and isolation throughout the video sequence. Additionally, mask regions generated by the chosen detection algorithm provide valuable data for feature extraction, which is crucial for subsequent lameness classification. The extracted cattle mask region values serve as the basis for feature extraction, capturing relevant information indicative of lameness. These features, combined with the local IDs assigned during tracking, are used to compute a lameness score for each cattle. We explore the efficacy of various established machine learning algorithms, such as Support Vector Machines (SVM), AdaBoost and so on, in analyzing the extracted lameness features. Evaluation of the proposed system was conducted across three key domains: detection, tracking, and lameness classification. Notably, the detection module employing Detectron2 achieved an impressive accuracy of 98.98%. Similarly, the tracking module attained a high accuracy of 99.50%. In lameness classification, AdaBoost emerged as the most effective algorithm, yielding the highest overall average accuracy (77.9%). Other established machine learning algorithms, including Decision Trees (DT), Support Vector Machines (SVM), and Random Forests, also demonstrated promising performance (DT: 75.32%, SVM: 75.20%, Random Forest: 74.9%). The presented approach demonstrates the successful implementation for cattle lameness detection. The proposed system has the potential to revolutionize dairy farm management by enabling early lameness detection and facilitating effective monitoring of cattle health. Our findings contribute valuable insights into the application of advanced computer vision methods for livestock health management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.