Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38877051›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Cervical cancer trend in the Republic of Kazakhstan and attitudes towards cervical cancer screening in urban and rural areas.

Indira Zhetpisbayeva, Alexander Rommel, Fatima Kassymbekova, Yuliya Semenova, Sholpan Sarmuldayeva, Azhar Giniyat, Gulnaz Tanatarova, Azhar Dyussupova, Raida Faizova, Venera Rakhmetova and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Indira ZhetpisbayevaDepartment of General Medical Practice-2, Asfendiyarov Kazakh National Medical University, St.Tole Bi 94, 050000, Almaty, Kazakhstan. iarmanovna85@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-9528-1196
Alexander Rommel *Department for Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7253-0535
Fatima KassymbekovaDepartment of Public Health and Social Sciences, Kazakhstan's Medical University "Kazakhstan School of Public Health", St.Utepova 19a, 050060, Almaty, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0001-6440-5590
Yuliya SemenovaSchool of Medicine, Nazarbayev University, Astana, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0003-1324-7806
Sholpan SarmuldayevaDepartment of the International Medical Faculty, University of International Business, Almaty, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0001-7122-4480
Azhar GiniyatNJSC "National Center for Children's Rehabilitation", Astana, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0009-0007-3476-0111
Gulnaz TanatarovaDepartment of Healthcare of Abay Region, Semey, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0002-5447-7862
Azhar DyussupovaDepartment of General Medical Practice, Semey Medical University, Semey, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0002-8857-4118
Raida FaizovaDepartment of General Medical Practice, Semey Medical University, Semey, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0002-7168-6826
Venera RakhmetovaDepartment of Internal Diseases, Astana Medical University, Astana, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0001-5721-6409
Natalya Glushkova *Department of Epidemiology, Evidence Medicine and Biostatistics, Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Almaty, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0003-1400-8436

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cervical cancer (CC) continues to be a significant global health issue, which in part can be attributed to disparities in access to CC screening services. This study aims to conduct a trend of CC in Kazakhstan and to compare attitudes towards the screening program between women living in urban and rural areas. In the first stage, we conducted a trend study of CC indicators in Kazakhstan using official statistics. In the second stage, a cross-sectional study was conducted using a structured questionnaire to assess adherence to screening. The trend study reveals a decline in cervical cancer mortality rates (from 7.15 to 5.93 per 100,000 female inhabitants) over the period studied, while the incidence remains stable (from 18.51 to 19.38 per 100,000 female inhabitants). Regional variations in Period Prevalence rates were observed. Significant differences were found in screening participation rates between urban n = 41 (74%) and rural n = 23 (38%) women, p < 0.001, as well as awareness of the screening program (urban: n = 15 (27%), rural: n = 35 (58%), p < 0.001). The trend study highlights a decrease in cervical cancer mortality rates over the specified period, accompanied by a consistent incidence rate. Additionally, regional disparities in period prevalence rates of cervical cancer were observed. The primary factor contributing to the low adherence of rural women to screening was found to be a lack of awareness regarding the screening program. Therefore, increasing awareness about the importance of screening is crucial for improving adherence rates among rural women in Kazakhstan.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerRural PopulationUrban PopulationUterine Cervical NeoplasmsAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansIncidenceKazakhstanMass ScreeningMiddle AgedPrevalenceSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID38877051
PMCPMC11178783

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.