Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38877042›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Repetitive invasive lung function maneuvers do not accentuate experimental fibrosis in mice.

Tina Röpke, Franziska Aschenbrenner, Lars Knudsen, Tobias Welte, Martin Kolb, Ulrich A Maus

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tina RöpkeDivision of Experimental Pneumology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Lower Saxony, Germany.
Franziska AschenbrennerDivision of Experimental Pneumology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Lower Saxony, Germany.
Lars KnudsenInstitute of Functional and Applied Anatomy, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Lower Saxony, Germany.
Tobias WelteClinic for Pneumology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Lower Saxony, Germany.
Martin KolbDepartment of Medicine, Pathology, and Molecular Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Ulrich A MausDivision of Experimental Pneumology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Lower Saxony, Germany. Maus.Ulrich@mh-hannover.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Assessment of lung function is an important clinical tool for the diagnosis and monitoring of chronic lung diseases, including idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). In mice, lung function maneuvers use algorithm-based ventilation strategies including forced oscillation technique (FOT), negative pressure-driven forced expiratory (NPFE) and pressure-volume (PV) maneuvers via the FlexiVent system. This lung function test (LFT) is usually performed as end-point measurement only, requiring several mice for each time point to be analyzed. Repetitive lung function maneuvers would allow monitoring of a disease process within the same individual while reducing the numbers of laboratory animals. However, its feasibility in mice and impact on developing lung fibrosis has not been studied so far. Using orotracheal cannulation without surgical exposure of the trachea, we examined the tolerability to repetitive lung function maneuvers (up to four times) in one and the same mouse, both under healthy conditions and in a model of AdTGF-β1 induced lung fibrosis. In essence, we found that repetitive invasive lung function maneuvers were well tolerated and did not accentuate experimental lung fibrosis in mice. This study contributes to the 3R principle aiming to reduce the numbers of experimental animals used in biomedical research.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalRespiratory Function TestsAnimalsIdiopathic Pulmonary FibrosisLungMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLPulmonary FibrosisTransforming Growth Factor beta1Transforming Growth Factor beta1

Identifiers

PMID38877042
PMCPMC11178923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.