Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38877041›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Effects of switching from intravitreal injection of aflibercept to faricimab on ocular blood flow in patients with diabetic macular edema.

Yoshinari Saima, Harumasa Yokota, Akifumi Kushiyama, Junya Hanaguri, Akira Ohno, Koyo Takase, Ruri Sugiyama, Kimimasa Muranaka, Satoru Yamagami, Taiji Nagaoka

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Switching to faricimab after prior anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy for persistent diabetic macular edema: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Yoshinari SaimaDivision of Ophthalmology, Department of Visual Sciences, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Harumasa YokotaDivision of Ophthalmology, Department of Visual Sciences, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Akifumi KushiyamaDepartment of Pharmacotherapy, Meiji Pharmaceutical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Junya HanaguriDivision of Ophthalmology, Department of Visual Sciences, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Akira OhnoDivision of Ophthalmology, Department of Visual Sciences, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Koyo TakaseDivision of Ophthalmology, Department of Visual Sciences, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Ruri SugiyamaDivision of Ophthalmology, Department of Visual Sciences, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Kimimasa MuranakaTokiwadai Muranaka Eye Clinic, Tokyo, Japan.
Satoru YamagamiDivision of Ophthalmology, Department of Visual Sciences, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Taiji NagaokaDivision of Ophthalmology, Department of Visual Sciences, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan. taijinagaoka@gmail.com.

Funding

a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Science, and Culture, Tokyo, Japan (C) 22K09822
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We assessed the short-term effects of switching from intravitreal aflibercept (IVA) to intravitreal faricimab (IVF) on ocular blood flow in patients with treatment-resistant diabetic macular edema (DME). The medical records of 15 patients with DME who had received IVA injection ≥ 3 months before were retrospectively reviewed. The best-corrected visual acuity, central macular thickness (CMT) on optical coherence tomography, and mean blur rate (MBR) of all disc areas on laser speckle flowgraphy were measured before, 1 week after, and 4 weeks after IVA and IVF, respectively. The changes in visual acuity showed no significant difference after switching from IVA to IVF (P = 0.732). The mean CMT decreased significantly during the follow-up period (both P < 0.001). MBR showed no significant difference during the follow-up period (P = 0.26). However, it decreased significantly 4 weeks after IVF (P = 0.01) compared with the baseline value, but not 4 weeks after IVA (P = 0.074). A significant association was observed between decreased MBR and decreased CMT in patients who received IVF (correlation coefficient: 0.501, P = 0.005) but not in those who received IVA (P = 0.735). Thus, IVF maintained ocular blood flow reduction, although no significant differences in visual acuity and CMT changes were observed compared to IVA.

Indexed as

Diabetic RetinopathyIntravitreal InjectionsMacular EdemaReceptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth FactorRecombinant Fusion ProteinsAgedAngiogenesis InhibitorsEyeFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRegional Blood FlowRetrospective StudiesTomography, Optical CoherenceVisual AcuityafliberceptAngiogenesis InhibitorsReceptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth FactorRecombinant Fusion Proteins

Identifiers

PMID38877041
PMCPMC11178773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.