ArticleUltrasound in medicine & biology2024
Influence of Phase Change Droplet Activation and Microbubble Cavitation on the Microenvironment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
Article in Ultrasound in medicine & biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Microbubble-based Radiosensitization of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Evaluation of Safety and Efficacy in a Phase II Randomized Trial.Radiology · 2025Trial
- Albumin as a natural and moldable biomaterial for biomimetic drug delivery applications.International journal of pharmaceutics · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveBoth microbubble ultrasound contrast agents and acoustic phase change droplets (APCD) have been explored in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This work aimed to evaluate changes to the HCC microenvironment following either microbubble or APCD destruction in a syngeneic pre-clinical model.
methodsMouse RIL-175 HCC tumors were grown in the right flank of 64 immunocompetent mice. Pre-treatment, photoacoustic volumetric tumor oxygenation, and power Doppler measurements were obtained using a Vevo 3100 system (VisualSonics, Toronto, Canada). The experimental groups received a 0.1 mL bolus injection of either Definity ultrasound contrast agent (Lantheus Medical Imaging) or APCD fabricated by condensing Definity. Following injection, ultrasound destruction was performed using flash-replenishment sequences on a Sequoia with a 10L4 probe (Siemens) for the duration of enhancement. Tumor oxygenation and power Doppler measurements were then repeated immediately post-ultrasound treatment. Twenty-four hours post-treatment, animals were euthanized, and tumors were harvested and stained for CD31, Cleaved Caspase 3 and CD45.
resultsImaging biomarkers demonstrated a significant reduction in percent vascularity following either microbubble or APCD destruction in the tumor microenvironment ( p < 0.022) but no significant changes in tumor oxygenation (p = 0.12). Similarly, immunohistochemistry data demonstrated a significant decrease in CD31 expression (p < 0.042) and an increase in apoptosis (p < 0.014) in tumors treated with destroyed microbubbles or APCD relative to controls. Finally, a significant increase in CD45 expression was observed in tumors treated with APCD (p = 0.046), indicating an increase in tumor immune response.
conclusionUltrasound-triggered destruction of both microbubbles and APCD reduces vascularity, increases apoptosis, and may also increase immune response in this HCC model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.