Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38876509›Full record

ArticleAnnals of the rheumatic diseases2024

EULAR recommendations for the involvement of patient research partners in rheumatology research: 2023 update.

Maarten de Wit, Krystel Aouad, Muriel Elhai, Diego Benavent, Heidi Bertheussen, Steven Blackburn, Peter Böhm, Catia Duarte, Marie Falahee, Susanne Karlfeldt and 15 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of the rheumatic diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. 'It Felt Safe'. Experiences With an Early Cognitive Behavioural Approach After Lumbar Spinal Surgery: A Qualitative Study of Participants' Perspectives.Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy · 2026
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Training Adolescents and Young Adults to be Partners in Research: Co-Creating the Young Patients' Autoimmune Research and Empowerment Alliance.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Citizen science in osteoarthritis research: a scoping review.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025
    Article
  19. The role of the patient in rheumatology.Nature reviews. Rheumatology · 2025
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors.

Maarten de WitPatient Research Partner, EULAR, Amsterdam, The Netherlands martinusdewit@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8428-6354
Krystel AouadSaint George Hospital University Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8708-9324
Muriel ElhaiUniversity Hospital Zürich, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Diego BenaventRheumatology, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9119-5330
Heidi BertheussenPatient Research Partner, EULAR, Oslo, Norway.
Steven BlackburnInstitute of Applied Health Research, Univeristy of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Peter BöhmPatient Research Partner, EULAR, Berlin, Germany.
Catia DuarteRheumatology, Centro Hospitalar e Universitario de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9327-6935
Marie FalaheeInstitute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham Rheumatology Research Group, Birmingham, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5928-486X
Susanne KarlfeldtAcademic Specialist Center, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Uta KiltzRuhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5668-4497
Elsa F MateusPatient Research Partner, EULAR, Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0059-2141
Dawn P RichardsCanadian Arthritis Patient Alliance, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Javier Rodríguez-CarrioArea of Immunology, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Principado de Asturias (ISPA), University of Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0011-5102
Joachim SagenNorwegian National Advisory Unit on Rehabilitation in Rheumatology, Oslo, Norway.
Russka ShumnalievaDepartment of Rheumatology, Clinic of Rheumatology, University Hospital "St Ivan Rilski", Medical University-Sofia, Sofia, Bulgaria.
Simon R StonesPatient Research Partner, EULAR, Manchester, UK.
Sander W TasDepartment of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
William TillettRoyal National Hospital for Rheumatic Disease, Bath, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7531-4125
Ana VieiraPortuguese League Against Rheumatic Diseases (LPCDR), Lisbon, Portugal.
Tanita-Christina WilhelmerEULAR Young PARE, Zürich, Switzerland.
Condruta ZabalanRomanian League Against Rheumatism, Bucharest, Romania.
Jette PrimdahlDanish Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Sønderborg, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1049-4150
Paul StudenicInternal Medicine 3, Division of Rheumatology, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8895-6941
Laure GossecINSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, INSERM, Sorbonne Universite, Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4528-310X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSince the publication of the 2011 European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) recommendations for patient research partner (PRP) involvement in rheumatology research, the role of PRPs has evolved considerably. Therefore, an update of the 2011 recommendations was deemed necessary.

methodsIn accordance with the EULAR Standardised Operational Procedures, a task force comprising 13 researchers, 2 health professionals and 10 PRPs was convened. The process included an online task force meeting, a systematic literature review and an in-person second task force meeting to formulate overarching principles (OAPs) and recommendations. The level of agreement of task force members was assessed anonymously (0-10 scale).

resultsThe task force developed five new OAPs, updated seven existing recommendations and formulated three new recommendations. The OAPs address the definition of a PRP, the contribution of PRPs, the role of informal caregivers, the added value of PRPs and the importance of trust and communication in collaborative research efforts. The recommendations address the research type and phases of PRP involvement, the recommended number of PRPs per project, the support necessary for PRPs, training of PRPs and acknowledgement of PRP contributions. New recommendations concern the benefits of support and guidance for researchers, the need for regular evaluation of the patient-researcher collaboration and the role of a designated coordinator to facilitate collaboration. Agreements within the task force were high and ranged between 9.16 and 9.96.

conclusionThe updated EULAR recommendations for PRP involvement are more substantially based on evidence. Together with added OAPs, they should serve as a guide for researchers and PRPs and will ultimately strengthen the involvement of PRPs in rheumatology research.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchPatient ParticipationRheumatologyAdvisory CommitteesCaregiversEuropeHumansArthritisEpidemiologyHealth services research

Identifiers

PMID38876509
PMCPMC11503179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.