ReviewThe Lancet. Rheumatology2024
Challenges of designing and conducting cohort studies and clinical trials in populations of pregnant people.
Review in The Lancet. Rheumatology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- A randomized trial to evaluate attitudes regarding pharmacogenomics among pregnant and pediatric populations: design and baseline characteristics.The pharmacogenomics journal · 2026Trial
- Comparison of BAFF and type I IFN activity in blood and placenta in SLE and healthy pregnancies.Lupus science & medicine · 2026Article
- Fertility, pregnancy and lactation in women with systemic lupus erythematosus.Nature reviews. Rheumatology · 2026Review
- 3D biofabricated in vitro models as new approach methodologies for animal alternatives.npj biomedical innovations · 2026Review
- Anifrolumab use in pregnancy: maternal and neonatal outcomes in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.EULAR rheumatology open · 2026Article
- Antiphospholipid syndrome and pregnancy-a hematologic perspective.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2026Article
- Progress in APS pregnancy: Results from the IMPACT trial.Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism · 2025Article
- Impact of conflicting information on the use of antirheumatic drugs in pregnancy and breastfeeding: perspectives of healthcare providers from the global PRAISE survey.Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease · 2025Article
- Research, pregnancy, and the ethics of parental consent.The Lancet. Rheumatology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases often affect individuals of childbearing age. The incidence and prevalence of rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases is rising. More pregnancies in patients with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases are anticipated and some rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases are associated with pregnancy complications (eg, miscarriages, fetal deaths, preterm births, and hypertensive disorders in pregnancy). Despite the need to understand the use of drugs to treat rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases in pregnancy, clinical trials in pregnancy are rare, therapeutics in pregnancy are understudied, and pregnant individuals are routinely excluded as premarketing trial participants. Data on the effectiveness and safety of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs are most often based on post-marketing observational data. Observational studies assessing the bidirectional relationship between rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases and pregnancy, as well as interventional studies of treatments during pregnancy, are scarce. Historical reluctance to perform studies in what was deemed an at-risk group persists in pharmaceutical companies, regulatory bodies, and ethics boards. Additionally, patients must be engaged partners, which requires trust that the research respects the needs and interests of the patient and complies with the rules intended to protect the pregnant person and the fetus from harm. In this Series paper, we share challenges we have encountered in conducting prospective cohort studies and interventional trials of postmarketing approved medications, assessing pregnancy specific outcomes in pregnant women with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases in the EU, the UK, and the USA. We discuss the changing landscape around trials in pregnancy and present possible solutions to our challenges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38876128What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.