Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38876110›Full record

ArticleStem cell reports2024

Self-assembling 3D vessel-on-chip model with hiPSC-derived astrocytes.

Dennis M Nahon, Marc Vila Cuenca, Francijna E van den Hil, Michel Hu, Tessa de Korte, Jean-Philippe Frimat, Arn M J M van den Maagdenberg, Christine L Mummery, Valeria V Orlova

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stem cell reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Dennis M NahonDepartment of Anatomy and Embryology, Leiden University Medical Centre, 2333ZA Leiden, the Netherlands.
Marc Vila CuencaDepartment of Anatomy and Embryology, Leiden University Medical Centre, 2333ZA Leiden, the Netherlands; Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Centre, 2333ZA Leiden, the Netherlands.
Francijna E van den HilDepartment of Anatomy and Embryology, Leiden University Medical Centre, 2333ZA Leiden, the Netherlands.
Michel HuDepartment of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Centre, 2333ZA Leiden, the Netherlands; Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Centre, 2333ZA Leiden, the Netherlands.
Tessa de KorteDepartment of Anatomy and Embryology, Leiden University Medical Centre, 2333ZA Leiden, the Netherlands.
Jean-Philippe FrimatDepartment of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Centre, 2333ZA Leiden, the Netherlands; Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Centre, 2333ZA Leiden, the Netherlands.
Arn M J M van den MaagdenbergDepartment of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Centre, 2333ZA Leiden, the Netherlands; Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Centre, 2333ZA Leiden, the Netherlands.
Christine L MummeryDepartment of Anatomy and Embryology, Leiden University Medical Centre, 2333ZA Leiden, the Netherlands.
Valeria V OrlovaDepartment of Anatomy and Embryology, Leiden University Medical Centre, 2333ZA Leiden, the Netherlands. Electronic address: v.orlova@lumc.nl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Functionality of the blood-brain barrier (BBB) relies on the interaction between endothelial cells (ECs), pericytes, and astrocytes to regulate molecule transport within the central nervous system. Most experimental models for the BBB rely on freshly isolated primary brain cells. Here, we explored human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) as a cellular source for astrocytes in a 3D vessel-on-chip (VoC) model. Self-organized microvascular networks were formed by combining hiPSC-derived ECs, human brain vascular pericytes, and hiPSC-derived astrocytes within a fibrin hydrogel. The hiPSC-ECs and pericytes showed close interactions, but, somewhat unexpectedly, addition of astrocytes disrupted microvascular network formation. However, continuous fluid perfusion or activation of cyclic AMP (cAMP) signaling rescued the vascular organization and decreased vascular permeability. Nevertheless, astrocytes did not affect the expression of proteins related to junction formation, transport, or extracellular matrix, indicating that, despite other claims, hiPSC-derived ECs do not entirely acquire a BBB-like identity in the 3D VoC model.

Indexed as

AstrocytesBlood-Brain BarrierEndothelial CellsInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsCell DifferentiationCells, CulturedCyclic AMPHumansHydrogelsLab-On-A-Chip DevicesModels, BiologicalPericytesCyclic AMPHydrogelsBBBblood-brain barrierhiPSC-AstrohiPSC-derived astrocyteshiPSC-derived endothelial cellshiPSC-ECshuman induced pluripotent stem cellsmicrofluidicsorgan-on-chipvessel-on-chip

Identifiers

PMID38876110
PMCPMC11252484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.