Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38875694›Full record

ArticleJMIR biomedical engineering2023

Mixed Reality Platforms in Telehealth Delivery: Scoping Review.

Hemendra Worlikar, Sean Coleman, Jack Kelly, Sadhbh O'Connor, Aoife Murray, Terri McVeigh, Jennifer Doran, Ian McCabe, Derek O'Keeffe

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR biomedical engineering, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Hemendra Worlikar *Health Innovation Via Engineering Laboratory, Cúram Science Foundation Ireland Research Centre for Medical Devices, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6593-2616
Sean ColemanHealth Innovation Via Engineering Laboratory, Cúram Science Foundation Ireland Research Centre for Medical Devices, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0770-2219
Jack KellyHealth Innovation Via Engineering Laboratory, Cúram Science Foundation Ireland Research Centre for Medical Devices, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6013-572X
Sadhbh O'ConnorHealth Innovation Via Engineering Laboratory, Cúram Science Foundation Ireland Research Centre for Medical Devices, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8685-6373
Aoife MurrayHealth Innovation Via Engineering Laboratory, Cúram Science Foundation Ireland Research Centre for Medical Devices, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1986-9414
Terri McVeighCancer Genetics Unit, The Royal Marsden National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9201-9216
Jennifer DoranHealth Innovation Via Engineering Laboratory, Cúram Science Foundation Ireland Research Centre for Medical Devices, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7201-858X
Ian McCabeHealth Innovation Via Engineering Laboratory, Cúram Science Foundation Ireland Research Centre for Medical Devices, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2497-4590
Derek O'KeeffeDepartment of Medicine, University Hospital Galway, Galway, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8501-2382

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe distinctive features of the digital reality platforms, namely augmented reality (AR), virtual reality (VR), and mixed reality (MR) have extended to medical education, training, simulation, and patient care. Furthermore, this digital reality technology seamlessly merges with information and communication technology creating an enriched telehealth ecosystem. This review provides a composite overview of the prospects of telehealth delivered using the MR platform in clinical settings.

objectiveThis review identifies various clinical applications of high-fidelity digital display technology, namely AR, VR, and MR, delivered using telehealth capabilities. Next, the review focuses on the technical characteristics, hardware, and software technologies used in the composition of AR, VR, and MR in telehealth.

methodsWe conducted a scoping review using the methodological framework and reporting design using the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews) guidelines. Full-length articles in English were obtained from the Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science databases. The search protocol was based on the following keywords and Medical Subject Headings to obtain relevant results: "augmented reality," "virtual reality," "mixed-reality," "telemedicine," "telehealth," and "digital health." A predefined inclusion-exclusion criterion was developed in filtering the obtained results and the final selection of the articles, followed by data extraction and construction of the review.

resultsWe identified 4407 articles, of which 320 were eligible for full-text screening. A total of 134 full-text articles were included in the review. Telerehabilitation, telementoring, teleconsultation, telemonitoring, telepsychiatry, telesurgery, and telediagnosis were the segments of the telehealth division that explored the use of AR, VR, and MR platforms. Telerehabilitation using VR was the most commonly recurring segment in the included studies. AR and MR has been mainly used for telementoring and teleconsultation. The most important technical features of digital reality technology to emerge with telehealth were virtual environment, exergaming, 3D avatars, telepresence, anchoring annotations, and first-person viewpoint. Different arrangements of technology-3D modeling and viewing tools, communication and streaming platforms, file transfer and sharing platforms, sensors, high-fidelity displays, and controllers-formed the basis of most systems.

conclusionsThis review constitutes a recent overview of the evolving digital AR and VR in various clinical applications using the telehealth setup. This combination of telehealth with AR, VR, and MR allows for remote facilitation of clinical expertise and further development of home-based treatment. This review explores the rapidly growing suite of technologies available to users within the digital health sector and examines the opportunities and challenges they present.

Indexed as

augmented realityeHealthmHealthmixed realitiesmobile healthtelemedicinevirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID38875694
PMCPMC11041465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.