Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38875691›Full record

ArticleJMIR biomedical engineering2024

A Deep Learning Framework for Predicting Patient Decannulation on Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Devices: Development and Model Analysis Study.

Joshua Fuller, Alexey Abramov, Dana Mullin, James Beck, Philippe Lemaitre, Elham Azizi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR biomedical engineering, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Artificial intelligence in respiratory care.Frontiers in digital health · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Joshua FullerVagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York City, NY, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9089-0830
Alexey AbramovDepartment of Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5864-4923
Dana MullinClinical Perfusion, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-1263-4478
James BeckClinical Perfusion, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8930-7874
Philippe LemaitreDepartment of Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7145-8025
Elham AziziDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, New York City, NY, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5059-6971

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVenovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) is a therapy for patients with refractory respiratory failure. The decision to decannulate someone from extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) often involves weaning trials and clinical intuition. To date, there are limited prognostication metrics to guide clinical decision-making to determine which patients will be successfully weaned and decannulated.

objectiveThis study aims to assist clinicians with the decision to decannulate a patient from ECMO, using Continuous Evaluation of VV-ECMO Outcomes (CEVVO), a deep learning-based model for predicting success of decannulation in patients supported on VV-ECMO. The running metric may be applied daily to categorize patients into high-risk and low-risk groups. Using these data, providers may consider initiating a weaning trial based on their expertise and CEVVO.

methodsData were collected from 118 patients supported with VV-ECMO at the Columbia University Irving Medical Center. Using a long short-term memory-based network, CEVVO is the first model capable of integrating discrete clinical information with continuous data collected from an ECMO device. A total of 12 sets of 5-fold cross validations were conducted to assess the performance, which was measured using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and average precision (AP). To translate the predicted values into a clinically useful metric, the model results were calibrated and stratified into risk groups, ranging from 0 (high risk) to 3 (low risk). To further investigate the performance edge of CEVVO, 2 synthetic data sets were generated using Gaussian process regression. The first data set preserved the long-term dependency of the patient data set, whereas the second did not.

resultsCEVVO demonstrated consistently superior classification performance compared with contemporary models (P<.001 and P=.04 compared with the next highest AUROC and AP). Although the model's patient-by-patient predictive power may be too low to be integrated into a clinical setting (AUROC 95% CI 0.6822-0.7055; AP 95% CI 0.8515-0.8682), the patient risk classification system displayed greater potential. When measured at 72 hours, the high-risk group had a successful decannulation rate of 58% (7/12), whereas the low-risk group had a successful decannulation rate of 92% (11/12; P=.04). When measured at 96 hours, the high- and low-risk groups had a successful decannulation rate of 54% (6/11) and 100% (9/9), respectively (P=.01). We hypothesized that the improved performance of CEVVO was owing to its ability to efficiently capture transient temporal patterns. Indeed, CEVVO exhibited improved performance on synthetic data with inherent temporal dependencies (P<.001) compared with logistic regression and a dense neural network.

conclusionsThe ability to interpret and integrate large data sets is paramount for creating accurate models capable of assisting clinicians in risk stratifying patients supported on VV-ECMO. Our framework may guide future incorporation of CEVVO into more comprehensive intensive care monitoring systems.

Indexed as

AIartificial intelligenceclinical AIclinical decision supportdynamic dataECMOextracorporeal membrane oxygenationhealth informaticsmachine learningsupervised learningtime seriesvenovenousVV

Identifiers

PMID38875691
PMCPMC11041448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.