Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38875594›Full record

ArticleJMIR AI2024

Sepsis Prediction at Emergency Department Triage Using Natural Language Processing: Retrospective Cohort Study.

Felix Brann, Nicholas William Sterling, Stephanie O Frisch, Justin D Schrager

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR AI, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Validation and comparison of triage-based screening strategies for sepsis.The American journal of emergency medicine · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Felix BrannVital Software, Inc, Claymont, DE, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-5963-2216
Nicholas William SterlingVital Software, Inc, Claymont, DE, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6240-0892
Stephanie O FrischVital Software, Inc, Claymont, DE, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3692-3125
Justin D SchragerVital Software, Inc, Claymont, DE, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2291-8640

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite its high lethality, sepsis can be difficult to detect on initial presentation to the emergency department (ED). Machine learning-based tools may provide avenues for earlier detection and lifesaving intervention.

objectiveThe study aimed to predict sepsis at the time of ED triage using natural language processing of nursing triage notes and available clinical data.

methodsWe constructed a retrospective cohort of all 1,234,434 consecutive ED encounters in 2015-2021 from 4 separate clinically heterogeneous academically affiliated EDs. After exclusion criteria were applied, the final cohort included 1,059,386 adult ED encounters. The primary outcome criteria for sepsis were presumed severe infection and acute organ dysfunction. After vectorization and dimensional reduction of triage notes and clinical data available at triage, a decision tree-based ensemble (time-of-triage) model was trained to predict sepsis using the training subset (n=950,921). A separate (comprehensive) model was trained using these data and laboratory data, as it became available at 1-hour intervals, after triage. Model performances were evaluated using the test (n=108,465) subset.

resultsSepsis occurred in 35,318 encounters (incidence 3.45%). For sepsis prediction at the time of patient triage, using the primary definition, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and macro F

conclusionsSepsis can accurately be predicted at ED presentation using nursing triage notes and clinical information available at the time of triage. This indicates that machine learning can facilitate timely and reliable alerting for intervention. Free-text data can improve the performance of predictive modeling at the time of triage and throughout the ED course.

Indexed as

emergency departmentmachine learningnatural language processingsepsistriage

Identifiers

PMID38875594
PMCPMC11041457

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.