ArticleJMIR AI2024
Toward Clinical Generative AI: Conceptual Framework.
Article in JMIR AI, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The potentials and challenges of integrating generative artificial intelligence (AI) in dental and orthodontic education: a systematic review.BMC oral health · 2025Pooled it
- Comparative performance of large language models for patient-oriented support in dental trauma emergencies.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Important Ethical, Technical, and Epidemiological Considerations in an AI Tool Production (ETEPAI): Scoping Review.JMIR AI · 2026Review
- AI-assisted thematic synthesis of existing neurological core outcome sets: A descriptive reference framework (COS-Neuro).PloS one · 2026Article
- Automated Multitier Tagging of Chinese Online Health Education Resources Using a Large Language Model: Development and Validation Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Using generative artificial intelligence in clinical practice: a narrative review and proposed agenda for implementation.The Medical journal of Australia · 2025Review
- AI-driven Technologies for Wrist Fracture Prediction: A Narrative Review of Emerging Approaches.Journal of wrist surgery · 2025Article
- Critique of impure reason: Unveiling the reasoning behaviour of medical large language models.eLife · 2025Article
- Expert evaluation of ChatGPT accuracy and reliability for basic celiac disease frequently asked questions.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Reporting guidelines for chatbot health advice studies: explanation and elaboration for the Chatbot Assessment Reporting Tool (CHART).BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2025Article
- Advances in Longevity: The Intersection of Regenerative Medicine and Cosmetic Dermatology.Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2025Review
- Development and validation of the provider documentation summarization quality instrument for large language models.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2025Article
- Prompts, privacy, and personalized learning: integrating AI into nursing education-a qualitative study.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- Proficiency, Clarity, and Objectivity of Large Language Models Versus Specialists' Knowledge on COVID-19's Impacts in Pregnancy: Cross-Sectional Pilot Study.JMIR formative research · 2025Article
- Global reform population health management as stewarded by Higher Expert Medical Science Safety (HEMSS).Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Article
- Monitoring oral health remotely: ethical considerations when using AI among vulnerable populations.Frontiers in oral health · 2025Article
- Challenges and opportunities of using artificial intelligence in rehabilitation from the perspective of students and professors in the Northeast Iran: A cross-sectional study.Journal of education and health promotion · 2025Article
- Evaluating AI performance in infectious disease education: a comparative analysis of ChatGPT, Google Bard, Perplexity AI, Microsoft Copilot, and Meta AI.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Uncertainties of healthcare professionals and informal caregivers in rare diseases: A systematic review.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Revolutionizing Sleep Health: The Emergence and Impact of Personalized Sleep Medicine.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Clinical decision-making is a crucial aspect of health care, involving the balanced integration of scientific evidence, clinical judgment, ethical considerations, and patient involvement. This process is dynamic and multifaceted, relying on clinicians' knowledge, experience, and intuitive understanding to achieve optimal patient outcomes through informed, evidence-based choices. The advent of generative artificial intelligence (AI) presents a revolutionary opportunity in clinical decision-making. AI's advanced data analysis and pattern recognition capabilities can significantly enhance the diagnosis and treatment of diseases, processing vast medical data to identify patterns, tailor treatments, predict disease progression, and aid in proactive patient management. However, the incorporation of AI into clinical decision-making raises concerns regarding the reliability and accuracy of AI-generated insights. To address these concerns, 11 "verification paradigms" are proposed in this paper, with each paradigm being a unique method to verify the evidence-based nature of AI in clinical decision-making. This paper also frames the concept of "clinically explainable, fair, and responsible, clinician-, expert-, and patient-in-the-loop AI." This model focuses on ensuring AI's comprehensibility, collaborative nature, and ethical grounding, advocating for AI to serve as an augmentative tool, with its decision-making processes being transparent and understandable to clinicians and patients. The integration of AI should enhance, not replace, the clinician's judgment and should involve continuous learning and adaptation based on real-world outcomes and ethical and legal compliance. In conclusion, while generative AI holds immense promise in enhancing clinical decision-making, it is essential to ensure that it produces evidence-based, reliable, and impactful knowledge. Using the outlined paradigms and approaches can help the medical and patient communities harness AI's potential while maintaining high patient care standards.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.