Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38875570›Full record

ArticleJMIR AI2023

Natural Language Processing for Clinical Laboratory Data Repository Systems: Implementation and Evaluation for Respiratory Viruses.

Elham Dolatabadi, Branson Chen, Sarah A Buchan, Alex Marchand Austin, Mahmoud Azimaee, Allison McGeer, Samira Mubareka, Jeffrey C Kwong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR AI, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Elham DolatabadiVector Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2236-2611
Branson ChenICES, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4224-0753
Sarah A BuchanInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5286-8974
Alex Marchand AustinICES, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5932-2037
Mahmoud AzimaeeInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6704-5129
Allison McGeerInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5647-6137
Samira MubarekaDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5012-2311
Jeffrey C KwongICES, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7820-2046

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith the growing volume and complexity of laboratory repositories, it has become tedious to parse unstructured data into structured and tabulated formats for secondary uses such as decision support, quality assurance, and outcome analysis. However, advances in natural language processing (NLP) approaches have enabled efficient and automated extraction of clinically meaningful medical concepts from unstructured reports.

objectiveIn this study, we aimed to determine the feasibility of using the NLP model for information extraction as an alternative approach to a time-consuming and operationally resource-intensive handcrafted rule-based tool. Therefore, we sought to develop and evaluate a deep learning-based NLP model to derive knowledge and extract information from text-based laboratory reports sourced from a provincial laboratory repository system.

methodsThe NLP model, a hierarchical multilabel classifier, was trained on a corpus of laboratory reports covering testing for 14 different respiratory viruses and viral subtypes. The corpus includes 87,500 unique laboratory reports annotated by 8 subject matter experts (SMEs). The classification task involved assigning the laboratory reports to labels at 2 levels: 24 fine-grained labels in level 1 and 6 coarse-grained labels in level 2. A "label" also refers to the status of a specific virus or strain being tested or detected (eg, influenza A is detected). The model's performance stability and variation were analyzed across all labels in the classification task. Additionally, the model's generalizability was evaluated internally and externally on various test sets.

resultsOverall, the NLP model performed well on internal, out-of-time (pre-COVID-19), and external (different laboratories) test sets with microaveraged F

conclusionsWe demonstrated that deep learning-based NLP models are promising solutions for information extraction from text-based laboratory reports. These approaches enable scalable, timely, and practical access to high-quality and encoded laboratory data if integrated into laboratory information system repositories.

Indexed as

EHRelectronic health recordhealthinformaticsknowledge extractionnatural language processing

Identifiers

PMID38875570
PMCPMC11057455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.