Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38875564›Full record

ArticleJMIR AI2024

Identifying Patterns of Smoking Cessation App Feature Use That Predict Successful Quitting: Secondary Analysis of Experimental Data Leveraging Machine Learning.

Leeann Nicole Siegel, Kara P Wiseman, Alex Budenz, Yvonne Prutzman

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR AI, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04623736 (Assessment of Smoking Cessation in a Publicly Available Cessation Smartphone Application), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04623736 nacompletednot on this map

Assessment of Smoking Cessation in a Publicly Available Cessation Smartphone Application

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of VirginiaRan2020 to 2021Enrolled152ConditionsTobacco UseArmsquitSTART
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Leeann Nicole SiegelNational Cancer Instiute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3033-2474
Kara P WisemanUniversity of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6956-0899
Alex BudenzNational Cancer Instiute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9885-9785
Yvonne PrutzmanNational Cancer Instiute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0138-9527

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLeveraging free smartphone apps can help expand the availability and use of evidence-based smoking cessation interventions. However, there is a need for additional research investigating how the use of different features within such apps impacts their effectiveness.

objectiveWe used observational data collected from an experiment of a publicly available smoking cessation app to develop supervised machine learning (SML) algorithms intended to distinguish the app features that promote successful smoking cessation. We then assessed the extent to which patterns of app feature use accounted for variance in cessation that could not be explained by other known predictors of cessation (eg, tobacco use behaviors).

methodsData came from an experiment (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04623736) testing the impacts of incentivizing ecological momentary assessments within the National Cancer Institute's quitSTART app. Participants' (N=133) app activity, including every action they took within the app and its corresponding time stamp, was recorded. Demographic and baseline tobacco use characteristics were measured at the start of the experiment, and short-term smoking cessation (7-day point prevalence abstinence) was measured at 4 weeks after baseline. Logistic regression SML modeling was used to estimate participants' probability of cessation from 28 variables reflecting participants' use of different app features, assigned experimental conditions, and phone type (iPhone [Apple Inc] or Android [Google]). The SML model was first fit in a training set (n=100) and then its accuracy was assessed in a held-aside test set (n=33). Within the test set, a likelihood ratio test (n=30) assessed whether adding individuals' SML-predicted probabilities of cessation to a logistic regression model that included demographic and tobacco use (eg, polyuse) variables explained additional variance in 4-week cessation.

resultsThe SML model's sensitivity (0.67) and specificity (0.67) in the held-aside test set indicated that individuals' patterns of using different app features predicted cessation with reasonable accuracy. The likelihood ratio test showed that the logistic regression, which included the SML model-predicted probabilities, was statistically equivalent to the model that only included the demographic and tobacco use variables (P=.16).

conclusionsHarnessing user data through SML could help determine the features of smoking cessation apps that are most useful. This methodological approach could be applied in future research focusing on smoking cessation app features to inform the development and improvement of smoking cessation apps.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT04623736; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04623736.

Indexed as

algorithmalgorithmsappapplication featureapplicationsappsartificial intelligencecessationfeaturesmachine learningmHealthmobile healthmobile phonequitquittingsmartphone appssmokesmokersmokerssmokingsmoking cessation

Identifiers

PMID38875564
PMCPMC11153975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.