Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38875552›Full record

ArticleJMIR AI2023

Developing an Inpatient Electronic Medical Record Phenotype for Hospital-Acquired Pressure Injuries: Case Study Using Natural Language Processing Models.

Elvira Nurmambetova, Jie Pan, Zilong Zhang, Guosong Wu, Seungwon Lee, Danielle A Southern, Elliot A Martin, Chester Ho, Yuan Xu, Cathy A Eastwood

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR AI, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Elvira Nurmambetova *Centre for Health Informatics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6391-8714
Jie Pan *Centre for Health Informatics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6398-1756
Zilong Zhang *Centre for Health Informatics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0239-8959
Guosong WuCentre for Health Informatics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0440-0784
Seungwon LeeCentre for Health Informatics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6532-5303
Danielle A SouthernCentre for Health Informatics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0006-0033
Elliot A MartinCentre for Health Informatics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5127-4333
Chester HoDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4238-5506
Yuan XuCentre for Health Informatics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2100-9437
Cathy A EastwoodCentre for Health Informatics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4569-8014

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSurveillance of hospital-acquired pressure injuries (HAPI) is often suboptimal when relying on administrative health data, as International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes are known to have long delays and are undercoded. We leveraged natural language processing (NLP) applications on free-text notes, particularly the inpatient nursing notes, from electronic medical records (EMRs), to more accurately and timely identify HAPIs.

objectiveThis study aimed to show that EMR-based phenotyping algorithms are more fitted to detect HAPIs than ICD-10-CA algorithms alone, while the clinical logs are recorded with higher accuracy via NLP using nursing notes.

methodsPatients with HAPIs were identified from head-to-toe skin assessments in a local tertiary acute care hospital during a clinical trial that took place from 2015 to 2018 in Calgary, Alberta, Canada. Clinical notes documented during the trial were extracted from the EMR database after the linkage with the discharge abstract database. Different combinations of several types of clinical notes were processed by sequential forward selection during the model development. Text classification algorithms for HAPI detection were developed using random forest (RF), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), and deep learning models. The classification threshold was tuned to enable the model to achieve similar specificity to an ICD-based phenotyping study. Each model's performance was assessed, and comparisons were made between the metrics, including sensitivity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and F

resultsData from 280 eligible patients were used in this study, among whom 97 patients had HAPIs during the trial. RF was the optimal performing model with a sensitivity of 0.464 (95% CI 0.365-0.563), specificity of 0.984 (95% CI 0.965-1.000), and F

conclusionsThe EMR-based NLP phenotyping algorithms demonstrated improved performance in HAPI case detection over ICD-10-CA codes alone. Daily generated nursing notes in EMRs are a valuable data resource for ML models to accurately detect adverse events. The study contributes to enhancing automated health care quality and safety surveillance.

Indexed as

algorithmdetectelectronic medical recordEMRmachine learningnatural language processingNLPphenotype algorithmphenotyping algorithmpressure injuriespressure injurypressure sorepressure ulcerpressure wound

Identifiers

PMID38875552
PMCPMC11041460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.