ArticleJMIR AI2023
Artificial Intelligence Algorithms in Health Care: Is the Current Food and Drug Administration Regulation Sufficient?
Article in JMIR AI, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence revolutionizing CNS drug discovery and development.Drug discovery today · 2026Review
- Algorithmic management: psychological measurement and associations with work design and mental strain.BMC psychology · 2025Article
- Evaluating transparency in AI/ML model characteristics for FDA-reviewed medical devices.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Thyroid disease classification using generative adversarial networks and Kolmogorov-Arnold network for three-class classification.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- A general framework for governing marketed AI/ML medical devices.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Advancements in Clinical Evaluation and Regulatory Frameworks for AI-Driven Software as a Medical Device (SaMD).IEEE open journal of engineering in medicine and biology · 2025Article
- A scoping review of reporting gaps in FDA-approved AI medical devices.NPJ digital medicine · 2024Article
- Algorithmic management and human-centered task design: a conceptual synthesis from the perspective of action regulation and sociomaterial systems theory.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2024Article
- International Market Access Strategies for Artificial Intelligence-Based Medical Devices: Can We Standardize the Process to Faster Patient Access?Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health · 2023Article
- Exploring the Intersection of Artificial Intelligence and Clinical Healthcare: A Multidisciplinary Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Given the growing use of machine learning (ML) technologies in health care, regulatory bodies face unique challenges in governing their clinical use. Under the regulatory framework of the Food and Drug Administration, approved ML algorithms are practically locked, preventing their adaptation in the ever-changing clinical environment, defeating the unique adaptive trait of ML technology in learning from real-world feedback. At the same time, regulations must enforce a strict level of patient safety to mitigate risk at a systemic level. Given that ML algorithms often support, or at times replace, the role of medical professionals, we have proposed a novel regulatory pathway analogous to the regulation of medical professionals, encompassing the life cycle of an algorithm from inception, development to clinical implementation, and continual clinical adaptation. We then discuss in-depth technical and nontechnical challenges to its implementation and offer potential solutions to unleash the full potential of ML technology in health care while ensuring quality, equity, and safety. References for this article were identified through searches of PubMed with the search terms "Artificial intelligence," "Machine learning," and "regulation" from June 25, 2017, until June 25, 2022. Articles were also identified through searches of the reference list of the articles. Only papers published in English were reviewed. The final reference list was generated based on originality and relevance to the broad scope of this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.