Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38875544›Full record

ArticleJMIR AI2023

Artificial Intelligence Algorithms in Health Care: Is the Current Food and Drug Administration Regulation Sufficient?

Meghavi Mashar, Shreya Chawla, Fangyue Chen, Baker Lubwama, Kyle Patel, Mihir A Kelshiker, Patrik Bachtiger, Nicholas S Peters

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR AI, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Meghavi Mashar *University College London NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2913-3320
Shreya Chawla *Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College of London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4720-2104
Fangyue ChenSchool of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5440-3206
Baker LubwamaSchool of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4561-1377
Kyle PatelSloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7740-2740
Mihir A KelshikerNational Heart and Lung Institute, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8189-7571
Patrik BachtigerNational Heart and Lung Institute, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3502-8869
Nicholas S PetersNational Heart and Lung Institute, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3581-8078

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Given the growing use of machine learning (ML) technologies in health care, regulatory bodies face unique challenges in governing their clinical use. Under the regulatory framework of the Food and Drug Administration, approved ML algorithms are practically locked, preventing their adaptation in the ever-changing clinical environment, defeating the unique adaptive trait of ML technology in learning from real-world feedback. At the same time, regulations must enforce a strict level of patient safety to mitigate risk at a systemic level. Given that ML algorithms often support, or at times replace, the role of medical professionals, we have proposed a novel regulatory pathway analogous to the regulation of medical professionals, encompassing the life cycle of an algorithm from inception, development to clinical implementation, and continual clinical adaptation. We then discuss in-depth technical and nontechnical challenges to its implementation and offer potential solutions to unleash the full potential of ML technology in health care while ensuring quality, equity, and safety. References for this article were identified through searches of PubMed with the search terms "Artificial intelligence," "Machine learning," and "regulation" from June 25, 2017, until June 25, 2022. Articles were also identified through searches of the reference list of the articles. Only papers published in English were reviewed. The final reference list was generated based on originality and relevance to the broad scope of this paper.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencemachine learningregulation

Identifiers

PMID38875544
PMCPMC11041443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.