ReviewJMIR AI2023
Predicting Adherence to Behavior Change Support Systems Using Machine Learning: Systematic Review.
Review in JMIR AI, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prediction of Adherence to an Online Wellness Program for People with Mobility Limitations: A Machine Learning Approach.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Machine Learning in Adapted Physical Activity: Clinical Applications, Monitoring, and Implementation Pathways for Personalized Exercise in Chronic Conditions: A Narrative Review.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2026Review
- Advances in implementation strategies for treatment adherence in schizophrenia: a narrative review.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Review
- Patient Autonomy in Medical Education: Navigating Ethical Challenges in the Age of Artificial Intelligence.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financingReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere is a dearth of knowledge on reliable adherence prediction measures in behavior change support systems (BCSSs). Existing reviews have predominately focused on self-reporting measures of adherence. These measures are susceptible to overestimation or underestimation of adherence behavior.
objectiveThis systematic review seeks to identify and summarize trends in the use of machine learning approaches to predict adherence to BCSSs.
methodsSystematic literature searches were conducted in the Scopus and PubMed electronic databases between January 2011 and August 2022. The initial search retrieved 2182 journal papers, but only 11 of these papers were eligible for this review.
resultsA total of 4 categories of adherence problems in BCSSs were identified: adherence to digital cognitive and behavioral interventions, medication adherence, physical activity adherence, and diet adherence. The use of machine learning techniques for real-time adherence prediction in BCSSs is gaining research attention. A total of 13 unique supervised learning techniques were identified and the majority of them were traditional machine learning techniques (eg, support vector machine). Long short-term memory, multilayer perception, and ensemble learning are currently the only advanced learning techniques. Despite the heterogeneity in the feature selection approaches, most prediction models achieved good classification accuracies. This indicates that the features or predictors used were a good representation of the adherence problem.
conclusionsUsing machine learning algorithms to predict the adherence behavior of a BCSS user can facilitate the reinforcement of adherence behavior. This can be achieved by developing intelligent BCSSs that can provide users with more personalized, tailored, and timely suggestions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.