Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38875537›Full record

ArticleJMIR AI2023

Few-Shot Learning for Clinical Natural Language Processing Using Siamese Neural Networks: Algorithm Development and Validation Study.

David Oniani, Premkumar Chandrasekar, Sonish Sivarajkumar, Yanshan Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR AI, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Learning to explain is a good biomedical few-shot learner.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024
    Article
  10. Automating Adjudication of Cardiovascular Events Using Large Language Models.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

David OnianiDepartment of Health Information Management, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9221-3059
Premkumar ChandrasekarDepartment of Health Information Management, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-4567-8501
Sonish SivarajkumarIntelligent Systems Program, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4173-1988
Yanshan WangDepartment of Health Information Management, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4433-7839

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNatural language processing (NLP) has become an emerging technology in health care that leverages a large amount of free-text data in electronic health records to improve patient care, support clinical decisions, and facilitate clinical and translational science research. Recently, deep learning has achieved state-of-the-art performance in many clinical NLP tasks. However, training deep learning models often requires large, annotated data sets, which are normally not publicly available and can be time-consuming to build in clinical domains. Working with smaller annotated data sets is typical in clinical NLP; therefore, ensuring that deep learning models perform well is crucial for real-world clinical NLP applications. A widely adopted approach is fine-tuning existing pretrained language models, but these attempts fall short when the training data set contains only a few annotated samples. Few-shot learning (FSL) has recently been investigated to tackle this problem. Siamese neural network (SNN) has been widely used as an FSL approach in computer vision but has not been studied well in NLP. Furthermore, the literature on its applications in clinical domains is scarce.

objectiveThe aim of our study is to propose and evaluate SNN-based approaches for few-shot clinical NLP tasks.

methodsWe propose 2 SNN-based FSL approaches, including pretrained SNN and SNN with second-order embeddings. We evaluate the proposed approaches on the clinical sentence classification task. We experiment with 3 few-shot settings, including 4-shot, 8-shot, and 16-shot learning. The clinical NLP task is benchmarked using the following 4 pretrained language models: bidirectional encoder representations from transformers (BERT), BERT for biomedical text mining (BioBERT), BioBERT trained on clinical notes (BioClinicalBERT), and generative pretrained transformer 2 (GPT-2). We also present a performance comparison between SNN-based approaches and the prompt-based GPT-2 approach.

resultsIn 4-shot sentence classification tasks, GPT-2 had the highest precision (0.63), but its recall (0.38) and F score (0.42) were lower than those of BioBERT-based pretrained SNN (0.45 and 0.46, respectively). In both 8-shot and 16-shot settings, SNN-based approaches outperformed GPT-2 in all 3 metrics of precision, recall, and F score.

conclusionsThe experimental results verified the effectiveness of the proposed SNN approaches for few-shot clinical NLP tasks.

Indexed as

few-shot learningFSLnatural language processingneural networksNLPSiamese neural networkSNN

Identifiers

PMID38875537
PMCPMC11041484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.