ArticleJCO clinical cancer informatics2024
MOSAIC: An Artificial Intelligence-Based Framework for Multimodal Analysis, Classification, and Personalized Prognostic Assessment in Rare Cancers.
Article in JCO clinical cancer informatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Artificial Intelligence and Genomic Data Analysis: New Frontiers in Precision Medicine.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Molecular-Based Ecosystem to Improve Personalized Medicine in Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2026Article
- Vision-Language Models in Medical Imaging for Cancer Diagnosis: A Bibliometric Review.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- APOLLO11: a bio-data-driven model for clinical and translational research in lung cancer.NPJ precision oncology · 2026Article
- Computational approaches to multimodal data integration in rheumatoid arthritis: from data landscape to clinical translation.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Review
- Mapping the landscape of AI and ML in vaccine innovation: A bibliometric study.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2025Article
- Paediatric rare diseases: Can large language models assist off-label prescribing?British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2025Article
- Longitudinal Synthetic Data Generation by Artificial Intelligence to Accelerate Clinical and Translational Research in Breast Cancer.JCO clinical cancer informatics · 2025Article
- Machine learning is changing osteoporosis detection: an integrative review.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2025Review
- Characterization and Clinical Implications of p53 Dysfunction in Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndromes.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2025Article
- A Comprehensive Review of Deep Learning Applications with Multi-Omics Data in Cancer Research.Genes · 2025Review
- Using Artificial Intelligence to Enhance Myelodysplastic Syndrome Diagnosis, Prognosis, and Treatment.Biomedicines · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
31 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeRare cancers constitute over 20% of human neoplasms, often affecting patients with unmet medical needs. The development of effective classification and prognostication systems is crucial to improve the decision-making process and drive innovative treatment strategies. We have created and implemented MOSAIC, an artificial intelligence (AI)-based framework designed for multimodal analysis, classification, and personalized prognostic assessment in rare cancers. Clinical validation was performed on myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), a rare hematologic cancer with clinical and genomic heterogeneities.
methodsWe analyzed 4,427 patients with MDS divided into training and validation cohorts. Deep learning methods were applied to integrate and impute clinical/genomic features. Clustering was performed by combining Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reduction + Hierarchical Density-Based Spatial Clustering of Applications with Noise (UMAP + HDBSCAN) methods, compared with the conventional Hierarchical Dirichlet Process (HDP). Linear and AI-based nonlinear approaches were compared for survival prediction. Explainable AI (Shapley Additive Explanations approach [SHAP]) and federated learning were used to improve the interpretation and the performance of the clinical models, integrating them into distributed infrastructure.
resultsUMAP + HDBSCAN clustering obtained a more granular patient stratification, achieving a higher average silhouette coefficient (0.16) with respect to HDP (0.01) and higher balanced accuracy in cluster classification by Random Forest (92.7% ± 1.3% and 85.8% ± 0.8%). AI methods for survival prediction outperform conventional statistical techniques and the reference prognostic tool for MDS. Nonlinear Gradient Boosting Survival stands in the internal (Concordance-Index [C-Index], 0.77; SD, 0.01) and external validation (C-Index, 0.74; SD, 0.02). SHAP analysis revealed that similar features drove patients' subgroups and outcomes in both training and validation cohorts. Federated implementation improved the accuracy of developed models.
conclusionMOSAIC provides an explainable and robust framework to optimize classification and prognostic assessment of rare cancers. AI-based approaches demonstrated superior accuracy in capturing genomic similarities and providing individual prognostic information compared with conventional statistical methods. Its federated implementation ensures broad clinical application, guaranteeing high performance and data protection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.