Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38875490›Full record

ArticleEuropace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology2024

Superior vena cava isolation using a pentaspline pulsed-field ablation catheter: feasibility and safety in patients undergoing atrial fibrillation catheter ablation.

Pierre Ollitrault, Corentin Chaumont, Jonaz Font, Martin Manninger, Sergio Conti, Paweł T Matusik, Bart A Mulder, Virginie Ferchaud, Arnaud Pellissier, Mayane Al Khoury and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pulsed field ablation for the interventional treatment of atrial fibrillation: a scientific statement of the European Heart Rhythm Association of the European Society of Cardiology, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society, and the Canadian Heart Rhythm Society.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026
    Guideline
  2. Pulmonary vein isolation with or without empiric superior vena cava isolation in patients undergoing ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: the randomized ESVCI-AF trial.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025
    Trial
  3. Termination of atrial arrhythmia and restoration of sinus rhythm during pulsed field ablation with a pentaspline catheter in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Superior vena cava isolation with 3D mapping using a novel balloon-in-basket pulsed field ablation catheter.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Very-high-power, ultra-short-duration radiofrequency for superior vena cava isolation: translational validation in porcine and clinical cohorts.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Pierre OllitraultElectrophysiology Unit, Department of Cardiology, Regional University Hospital, Avenue de la Côte de Nacre, 14000 Caen, France.ORCID 0000-0002-2739-1967
Corentin ChaumontDepartment of Cardiology, Rouen University Medical Center, Rue de Germont, 76031 Rouen, France.ORCID 0000-0001-7188-2686
Jonaz FontElectrophysiology Unit, Department of Cardiology, Regional University Hospital, Avenue de la Côte de Nacre, 14000 Caen, France.ORCID 0000-0002-3103-9739
Martin ManningerDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medical, Graz University Medical Center, Graz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-0545-4373
Sergio ContiDepartment of Cardiology, ARNAS Civico Hospital, Palermo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6683-6781
Paweł T MatusikDepartment of Cardiology, St. John Paul II Hospital, Prądnicka 80, 31-202 Kraków, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-5788-575X
Bart A MulderDepartment of Cardiology, Groningen University Medical Center, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4411-3918
Virginie FerchaudElectrophysiology Unit, Department of Cardiology, Regional University Hospital, Avenue de la Côte de Nacre, 14000 Caen, France.
Arnaud PellissierElectrophysiology Unit, Department of Cardiology, Regional University Hospital, Avenue de la Côte de Nacre, 14000 Caen, France.ORCID 0000-0001-9489-5711
Mayane Al KhouryElectrophysiology Unit, Department of Cardiology, Regional University Hospital, Avenue de la Côte de Nacre, 14000 Caen, France.ORCID 0009-0006-4947-5826
Paul MilliezElectrophysiology Unit, Department of Cardiology, Regional University Hospital, Avenue de la Côte de Nacre, 14000 Caen, France.
Laure Champ-RigotElectrophysiology Unit, Department of Cardiology, Regional University Hospital, Avenue de la Côte de Nacre, 14000 Caen, France.ORCID 0000-0001-5769-4398
Frédéric AnselmeDepartment of Cardiology, Rouen University Medical Center, Rue de Germont, 76031 Rouen, France.ORCID 0000-0002-2130-9790

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsSuperior vena cava (SVC) isolation during atrial fibrillation catheter ablation is limited by the risk of collateral damage to the sinus node and/or the phrenic nerve. Due to its tissue-specificity, we hypothesized the feasibility and safety of pulsed-field ablation (PFA)-based SVC isolation. METHODS AND

resultsOne hundred and five consecutive patients undergoing PFA-based AF catheter ablation were prospectively included. After pulmonary vein isolation (±posterior wall isolation and electrical cardioversion), SVC isolation was performed using a standardized workflow. Acute SVC isolation was achieved in 105/105 (100%) patients after 6 ± 1 applications. Transient phrenic nerve stunning occurred in 67/105 (64%) patients but without phrenic nerve palsy at the end of the procedure and at hospital discharge. Transient high-degree sinus node dysfunction occurred in 5/105 (4.7%) patients, with no recurrence at the end of the procedure and until discharge. At the 3-month follow-up visit, no complication occurred.

conclusionSVC isolation using a pentaspline PFA catheter is feasible and safe.

Indexed as

Atrial FibrillationCatheter AblationFeasibility StudiesVena Cava, SuperiorAgedCardiac CathetersEquipment DesignFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhrenic NerveProspective StudiesPulmonary VeinsTreatment OutcomeAtrial fibrillationCatheter ablationFeasibilityOutcomePulsed-field ablationSuperior vena cava

Identifiers

PMID38875490
PMCPMC11252500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.