ArticlePloS one2024
Identification of Arabidopsis thaliana small RNAs responsive to the fungal pathogen Botrytis cinerea at an early stage of interaction.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Small RNAs as systemic signals in plant defense: mechanisms, challenges, and future directions.Molecular biology reports · 2026Review
- Identification of miRNAs Responsive to a Defined Period of Iron Deficiency and Resupply inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Plant-derived vesicle-like nanoparticles in food crops: emerging insights into nutritional biofortification and biomedical applications.Plant biotechnology journal · 2025Review
- Ribosomes binding toFrontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- RNA interference shapes stress responses inFrontiers in plant science · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In plants, small RNAs (sRNAs), mainly microRNAs (miRNAs) and small interfering RNAs (siRNAs), have been described as key regulators of plant development, growth, and abiotic and biotic responses. Despite reports indicating the involvement of certain sRNAs in regulating the interaction between Botrytis cinerea (a major necrotrophic fungal phytopathogen) and host plants, there remains a lack of analysis regarding the potential regulatory roles of plant sRNAs during early stages of the interaction despite early immune responses observed then during infection. We present the first transcriptome-wide analysis of small RNA expression on the early interaction between the necrotrophic fungus Botrytis cinerea and the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana. We found that evolutionary conserved A. thaliana miRNAs were the sRNAs that accumulated the most in the presence of B. cinerea. The upregulation of miR167, miR159 and miR319 was of particular interest because these, together with their target transcripts, are involved in the fine regulation of the plant hormone signaling pathways. We also describe that miR173, which triggers the production of secondary siRNAs from TAS1 and TAS2 loci, as well as secondary siRNAs derived from these loci, is upregulated in response to B. cinerea. Thus, at an early stage of the interaction there are transcriptional changes of sRNA-guided silencing pathway genes and of a subset of sRNAs that targeted genes from the PPR gene superfamily, and these may be important mechanisms regulating the interaction between A. thaliana and B. cinerea. This work provides the basis for a better understanding of the regulation mediated by sRNAs during early B. cinerea-plant interaction and may help in the development of more effective strategies for its control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.