Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38875244›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Prediction of resistance to bevacizumab plus FOLFOX in metastatic colorectal cancer-Results of the prospective multicenter PERMAD trial.

Thomas Seufferlein, Ludwig Lausser, Alexander Stein, Dirk Arnold, Gerald Prager, Stefan Kasper-Virchow, Michael Niedermeier, Lothar Müller, Stefan Kubicka, Alexander König and 9 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Thomas SeufferleinDepartment of Internal Medicine I, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany.
Ludwig LausserInstitute of Medical Systems Biology, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
Alexander SteinHematology-Oncology Practice Eppendorf, University Cancer Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Dirk ArnoldAsklepios Cancer Center Hamburg, AK Altona, Hamburg, Germany.
Gerald PragerComprehensive Cancer Center Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Stefan Kasper-VirchowMedical Oncology, University Hospital Essen West German Cancer Center, Essen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5947-8733
Michael NiedermeierPrivate Practice, Memmingen, Germany.
Lothar MüllerPrivate Practice, Leer, Germany.
Stefan KubickaCancer Center Reutlingen, Reutlingen Hospital, Reutlingen, Germany.
Alexander KönigDepartment of Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Oncology and Endocrinology, University Medical Center Goettingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Petra Büchner-SteudelInternal Medicine I, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany.
Kai WilleHematology, Oncology, University Hospital Ruhr-University-Bochum, Minden, Germany.
Andreas W BergerDepartment of Internal Medicine I, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany.
Angelika M R KestlerDepartment of Internal Medicine I, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany.
Johann M KrausInstitute of Medical Systems Biology, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
Silke D WerleInstitute of Medical Systems Biology, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
Lukas PerkhoferDepartment of Internal Medicine I, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany.
Thomas J EttrichDepartment of Internal Medicine I, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany.
Hans A KestlerInstitute of Medical Systems Biology, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4759-5254

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are widely used for tumor treatment, including metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). So far, there are no biomarkers that reliably predict resistance to anti-VEGF mAbs like bevacizumab. A biomarker-guided strategy for early and accurate assessment of resistance could avoid the use of non-effective treatment and improve patient outcomes. We hypothesized that repeated analysis of multiple cytokines and angiogenic growth factors (CAFs) before and during treatment using machine learning could provide an accurate and earlier, i.e., 100 days before conventional radiologic staging, prediction of resistance to first-line mCRC treatment with FOLFOX plus bevacizumab. PATIENTS AND

methods15 German and Austrian centers prospectively recruited 50 mCRC patients receiving FOLFOX plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment. Plasma samples were collected every two weeks until radiologic progression (RECIST 1.1) as determined by CT scans performed every 2 months. 102 pre-selected CAFs were centrally analyzed using a cytokine multiplex assay (Luminex, Myriad RBM).

resultsUsing random forests, we developed a predictive machine learning model that discriminated between the situations of "no progress within 100 days before radiological progress" and "progress within 100 days before radiological progress". We could further identify a combination of ten out of the 102 CAF markers, which fulfilled this task with 78.2% accuracy, 71.8% sensitivity, and 82.5% specificity.

conclusionsWe identified a CAF marker combination that indicates treatment resistance to FOLFOX plus bevacizumab in patients with mCRC within 100 days prior to radiologic progress.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBevacizumabColorectal NeoplasmsDrug Resistance, NeoplasmFluorouracilLeucovorinOrganoplatinum CompoundsAdultAgedBiomarkers, TumorFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisProspective StudiesBevacizumabBiomarkers, TumorFluorouracilLeucovorinOrganoplatinum Compounds

Identifiers

PMID38875244
PMCPMC11178165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.