ArticlePloS one2024
Knowledge, attitude, and practice towards bacterial multidrug-resistance and structural equation modeling analysis among intensive care unit nurses and physicians.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Knowledge, attitude, and practice of central line-associated bloodstream infection prevention among intensive care unit nurses in Hebei Province, China: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Knowledge, attitude, and practice of aesthetic medicine practitioners towards laser and/or light therapy for hypertrophic scars.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe intensive care unit (ICU) is a department with a high risk of MDR bacteria, and ICU nurses and physicians play critical roles in bacterial multidrug resistance (MDR) prevention.
objectivesTo explore the knowledge, attitudes, and practice (KAP) towards bacterial MDR among ICU nurses and physicians.
methodsA self-designed questionnaire was administered to collect data. Structural equation modeling (SEM) was applied to assess the associations among study variables.
resultsA total of 369 questionnaires were collected; 43 questionnaires were excluded due to self-contradictory on the trap question or the obviously repeated pattern. Finally, 326 (88.35%) valid questionnaires were included in the analysis. The knowledge, attitudes, and practice were 13.57 ± 1.69 (90.47%, possible range: 0-15), 38.75 ± 2.23 (96.88%, possible range: 8-40), and 47.40 ± 3.59 (94.80%, possible range: 10-50). The SEM showed that knowledge had a direct effect on attitude with a direct effect value of 0.61 (P < 0.001) and a direct negative effect on practice with a direct effect value of -0.30 (P = 0.009). The direct effect of attitude on practice was 0.89 (P < 0.001); the indirect effect of knowledge through attitude on practice was 0.52 (P < 0.001). Job satisfaction had a direct effect on attitude and practice, with an effect value of 0.52 (P = 0.030) and 0.75 (P = 0.040). Being a physician (OR = 0.354, 95%CI: 0.159-0.790, P = 0.011), 5-9.9 years of practice (OR = 4.534, 95%CI: 1.878-8.721, P < 0.001), and ≥ 10 years of practice (OR = 3.369, 95%CI: 1.301-8.721, P = 0.012) were independently associated with good knowledge. The attitude scores (OR = 1.499, 95%CI: 1.227-1.830, P < 0.001), male gender (OR = 0.390, 95%CI: 0.175-0.870, P = 0.022), and 5-9.9 years of experience (OR = 0.373, 95%CI: 0.177-0.787, P = 0.010) were independently associated with proactive practice.
conclusionNurses and physicians in the ICU showed good knowledge, positive attitudes, and proactive practice toward bacterial MDR. Nurses and physicians' knowledge had a direct effect on their attitude, while attitude might directly influence the practice and also play a mediating role between knowledge and practice. Job satisfaction might directly support the positive attitude and practice toward bacterial MDR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.