Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38875086›Full record

ArticleIEEE transactions on medical imaging2024

Assessing the Capacity of a Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Model to Reproduce Spatial Context.

Rucha Deshpande, Muzaffer Ozbey, Hua Li, Mark A Anastasio, Frank J Brooks

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE transactions on medical imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Feasibility of improving vocal fold pathology image classification with synthetic images generated by DDPM-based GenAI: a pilot study.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2025
    Article
  3. Scorecard for synthetic medical data evaluation.Communications engineering · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rucha Deshpande
Muzaffer Ozbey
Hua Li
Mark A Anastasio
Frank J Brooks

Funding

The Center for Label-free Imagingand Multiscale Biophotonics (CLIMB)P41EB031772 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI Stephen A Boppart · 2022 to 2026
$7.6M
Quantitative histopathology for cancer prognosis using quantitative phase imaging on stained tissuesR01CA238191 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI ANASTASIO, MARK A, ELICEIRI, KEVIN WILLIAM · 2019 to 2023
$3.1M
A Computational Framework Enabling Virtual Imaging Trials of 3D Quantitative Optoacoustic Tomography Breast ImagingR01EB031585 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI ANASTASIO, MARK A · 2022 to 2025
$2.3M
Deep learning technologies for estimating the optimal task performance of medical imaging systemsR01EB034249 · NIBIB · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Mark A Anastasio · 2023 to 2026
$1.7M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA238191NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB031772NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB031585NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB034249
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diffusion models have emerged as a popular family of deep generative models (DGMs). In the literature, it has been claimed that one class of diffusion models-denoising diffusion probabilistic models (DDPMs)-demonstrate superior image synthesis performance as compared to generative adversarial networks (GANs). To date, these claims have been evaluated using either ensemble-based methods designed for natural images, or conventional measures of image quality such as structural similarity. However, there remains an important need to understand the extent to which DDPMs can reliably learn medical imaging domain-relevant information, which is referred to as 'spatial context' in this work. To address this, a systematic assessment of the ability of DDPMs to learn spatial context relevant to medical imaging applications is reported for the first time. A key aspect of the studies is the use of stochastic context models (SCMs) to produce training data. In this way, the ability of the DDPMs to reliably reproduce spatial context can be quantitatively assessed by use of post-hoc image analyses. Error-rates in DDPM-generated ensembles are reported, and compared to those corresponding to other modern DGMs. The studies reveal new and important insights regarding the capacity of DDPMs to learn spatial context. Notably, the results demonstrate that DDPMs hold significant capacity for generating contextually correct images that are 'interpolated' between training samples, which may benefit data-augmentation tasks in ways that GANs cannot.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedModels, StatisticalAlgorithmsBrainDeep LearningHumansSignal-To-Noise Ratio

Identifiers

PMID38875086
PMCPMC11608762

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.