Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38875078›Full record

ArticleIEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics2024

Brain Tumor Recurrence vs. Radiation Necrosis Classification and Patient Survivability Prediction.

M S Sadique, W Farzana, A Temtam, E Lappinen, A Vossough, K M Iftekharuddin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. RN-DFrontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

M S Sadique
W Farzana
A Temtam
E Lappinen
A Vossough
K M Iftekharuddin

Funding

Quantitative imaging and molecular data modeling for brain tumor recurrence and progression analysisR01EB020683 · NIBIB · OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY · PI Khan M Iftekharuddin · 2016 to 2026
$3.2M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB020683
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

GB (Glioblastoma WHO Grade 4) is the most aggressive type of brain tumor in adults that has a short survival rate even after aggressive treatment with surgery and radiation therapy. The changes in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for patients with GB after radiotherapy are indicative of either radiation-induced necrosis (RN) or recurrent brain tumor (rBT). Screening for rBT and RN at an early stage is crucial for facilitating faster treatment and better outcomes for the patients. Differentiating rBT from RN is challenging as both may present with similar radiological and clinical characteristics on MRI. Moreover, learning-based rBT versus RN classification using MRI may suffer from class imbalance due to a lack of patient data. While synthetic data generation using generative models has shown promise to address class imbalances, the underlying data representation may be different in synthetic or augmented data. This study proposes computational modeling with statistically rigorous repeated random sub-sampling to balance the subset sample size for rBT and RN classification. The proposed pipeline includes multiresolution radiomic feature (MRF) extraction followed by feature selection with statistical significance testing (p<0.05). The five-fold cross validation results show the proposed model with MRF features classifies rBT from RN with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.892±0.055. Moreover, considering the dependence between survival time and censoring time (where patients are not followed up until death), the feasibility of using MRF radiomic features as a non-invasive biomarker to identify patients who are at higher risk of recurrence or radiation necrosis is demonstrated. The cross-validated results show that the MRF model provides the best overall survival prediction with an AUC of 0.77±0.032. Comparison with state-of-the-art methods suggest the proposed method is effective in RN versus rBT classification and patient survivability prediction.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsMagnetic Resonance ImagingNecrosisNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalRadiation InjuriesAdultAgedAlgorithmsBrainFemaleGlioblastomaHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID38875078
PMCPMC11492206

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.