ArticleIEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics2024
Brain Tumor Recurrence vs. Radiation Necrosis Classification and Patient Survivability Prediction.
Article in IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Radiomics in glioblastoma recurrence: advances in prediction, localization, and differentiation from treatment-related effects.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Review
- RN-DFrontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- Diagnostic classification of children and adolescents with high-functioning autism spectrum disorder based on brain functional network characteristics of the dense individualized and common connectivity-based cortical landmark model.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- Deep Neural Network-Based Risk Prediction of Glioblastoma Multiforme Recurrence.Journal of molecular neuroscience : MN · 2025Article
- Radiomics and Radiogenomics in Differentiating Progression, Pseudoprogression, and Radiation Necrosis in Gliomas.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- A twin-tower model using MRI and gene for prediction on brain tumor patients' response to therapy.Bioinformatics advances · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
GB (Glioblastoma WHO Grade 4) is the most aggressive type of brain tumor in adults that has a short survival rate even after aggressive treatment with surgery and radiation therapy. The changes in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for patients with GB after radiotherapy are indicative of either radiation-induced necrosis (RN) or recurrent brain tumor (rBT). Screening for rBT and RN at an early stage is crucial for facilitating faster treatment and better outcomes for the patients. Differentiating rBT from RN is challenging as both may present with similar radiological and clinical characteristics on MRI. Moreover, learning-based rBT versus RN classification using MRI may suffer from class imbalance due to a lack of patient data. While synthetic data generation using generative models has shown promise to address class imbalances, the underlying data representation may be different in synthetic or augmented data. This study proposes computational modeling with statistically rigorous repeated random sub-sampling to balance the subset sample size for rBT and RN classification. The proposed pipeline includes multiresolution radiomic feature (MRF) extraction followed by feature selection with statistical significance testing (p<0.05). The five-fold cross validation results show the proposed model with MRF features classifies rBT from RN with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.892±0.055. Moreover, considering the dependence between survival time and censoring time (where patients are not followed up until death), the feasibility of using MRF radiomic features as a non-invasive biomarker to identify patients who are at higher risk of recurrence or radiation necrosis is demonstrated. The cross-validated results show that the MRF model provides the best overall survival prediction with an AUC of 0.77±0.032. Comparison with state-of-the-art methods suggest the proposed method is effective in RN versus rBT classification and patient survivability prediction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.