Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38875039›Full record

ArticleJournal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD2024

Eye Adult Changes in Thought (Eye ACT) Study: Design and Report on the Inaugural Cohort.

Cecilia S Lee, Alina N Ferguson, Laura E Gibbons, Rod Walker, Yu-Ru Su, Chloe Krakauer, Michael Brush, Jason Kam, Eric B Larson, David E Arterburn and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Cecilia S LeeDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Alina N FergusonDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Laura E GibbonsDepartment of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Rod WalkerKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.
Yu-Ru SuKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.
Chloe KrakauerKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.
Michael BrushKaiser Permanente Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Jason KamKaiser Permanente Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Eric B LarsonDepartment of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
David E ArterburnKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.
Paul K CraneDepartment of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Eye ACT Study Group:

Funding

Translational pharmacoepidemiology: neuroprotection and neurotoxicity of antihypertensives and strong anticholinergicsU19AG066567 · NIA · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI Christine L MacDonald · 2021 to 2026
$80.4M
Aging eyes and aging brains in studying alzheimer's disease: Modern ophthalmic data collection in the adult changes in thought (ACT) studyR01AG060942 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Cecilia Sungmin Lee · 2019 to 2026
$39.4M
Furthering scientific understanding of mechanisms underlying resilience to the effects of AD pathology by incorporating state of the art quantification of gliosis, inflammation, & synaptic toxicityU01AG006781 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI CRANE, PAUL K, LARSON, ERIC B · 1986 to 2020
$39.3M
Bridge2AI:Salutogenesis Data Generation ProjectOT2OD032644 · OD · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BAXTER, SALLY LIU, CHUTE, CHRISTOPHER G · 2022 to 2025
$32.7M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG060942NIA NIH HHS U01 AG006781NIA NIH HHS U19 AG066567NIH HHS OT2 OD032644
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Conflicting research on retinal biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (AD/ADRD) is likely related to limited sample sizes, study design, and protocol differences. Objective: The prospective Eye Adult Changes in Thought (Eye ACT) seeks to address these gaps. Methods: Eye ACT participants are recruited from ACT, an ongoing cohort of dementia-free, older adults followed biennially until AD/ADRD, and undergo visual function and retinal imaging assessment either in clinic or at home. Results: 330 participants were recruited as of 03/2023. Compared to ACT participants not in Eye ACT (N = 1868), Eye ACT participants (N = 330) are younger (mean age: 70.3 versus 71.2, p = 0.014), newer to ACT (median ACT visits since baseline: 3 versus 4, p < 0.001), have more years of education (17.7 versus 16.2, p < 0.001) and had lower rates of visual impairment (12% versus 22%, p < 0.001). Compared to those seen in clinic (N = 300), Eye ACT participants seen at home (N = 30) are older (77.2 versus 74.9, p = 0.015), more frequently female (60% versus 49%, p = 0.026), and have significantly worse visual acuity (71.1 versus 78.9 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters, p < 0.001) and contrast sensitivity (-1.9 versus -2.1 mean log units at 3 cycles per degree, p = 0.002). Cognitive scores and retinal imaging measurements are similar between the two groups. Conclusions: Participants assessed at home had significantly worse visual function than those seen in clinic. By including these participants, Eye ACT provides a unique longitudinal cohort for evaluating potential retinal biomarkers of dementia.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesDementiaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesResearch DesignRetinaTomography, Optical CoherenceVision DisordersAdult Changes in Thought (ACT)age-related macular degenerationAlzheimer’s diseaseCognitive Abilities Screening Instrument (CASI) scorecontrast sensitivityEye Adult Changes in Thought (Eye ACT)ophthalmologyoptical coherence measurementprospective studyvisual acuity

Identifiers

PMID38875039
PMCPMC11556780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.