Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38874955›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of sport science2024

Full-body resistance training promotes greater fat mass loss than a split-body routine in well-trained males: A randomized trial.

Marcelo A S Carneiro, Paulo Ricardo P Nunes, Markus V C Souza, Cláudio O Assumpção, Fábio L Orsatti

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of sport science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Marcelo A S CarneiroApplied Physiology, Nutrition and Exercise Research Group (PhyNEr), Federal University of Triangulo Mineiro, Uberaba, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5252-7790
Paulo Ricardo P NunesApplied Physiology, Nutrition and Exercise Research Group (PhyNEr), Federal University of Triangulo Mineiro, Uberaba, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Markus V C SouzaApplied Physiology, Nutrition and Exercise Research Group (PhyNEr), Federal University of Triangulo Mineiro, Uberaba, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Cláudio O AssumpçãoApplied Physiology, Nutrition and Exercise Research Group (PhyNEr), Federal University of Triangulo Mineiro, Uberaba, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Fábio L OrsattiApplied Physiology, Nutrition and Exercise Research Group (PhyNEr), Federal University of Triangulo Mineiro, Uberaba, Minas Gerais, Brazil.

Funding

CNPq/Brazil 140473/2020-3Coordination of Improvement of Higher Education Personnel Code 001Minas Gerais Research FoundationNational Council of Technological and Scientific Development
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While significant progress has been made in understanding the resistance training (RT) strategy for muscle hypertrophy increase, there remains limited knowledge about its impact on fat mass loss. This study aimed to investigate whether full-body is superior to split-body routine in promoting fat mass loss among well-trained males. Twenty-three participants were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 groups: full-body (n = 11, training muscle groups 5 days per week) and split-body (n = 12, training muscle groups 1 day per week). Both groups performed a weekly set volume-matched condition (75 sets/week, 8-12 repetition maximum at 70%-80 % of 1RM) for 8 weeks, 5 days per week with differences only in the routine. Whole-body and regional fat were assessed using DXA at the beginning and at the end of the study. Full-body RT elicited greater losses compared to split-body in whole-body fat mass (-0.775 ± 1.120 kg vs. +0.317 ± 1.260 kg; p = 0.040), upper-limb fat mass (-0.085 ± 0.118 kg vs. +0.066 ± 0.162 kg; p = 0.019), gynoid fat mass (-0.142 ± 0.230 kg vs. +0.123 ± 0.230 kg; p = 0.012), lower-limb fat mass (-0.197 ± 0.204 kg vs. +0.055 ± 0.328 kg; p = 0.040), and a trend in interaction in android fat mass (-0.116 ± 0.153 kg vs. +0.026 ± 0.174 kg; p = 0.051), with large effects sizes (η

Indexed as

Resistance TrainingAbsorptiometry, PhotonAdipose TissueAdultBody CompositionHumansMaleMuscle, SkeletalYoung Adultbody compositionsplit routinestrength trainingtotal‐body routine

Identifiers

PMID38874955
PMCPMC11236007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.