ArticleJAMA network open2024
Cervical Cancer Screening Rates Among Rural and Urban Females, From 2019 to 2022.
Article in JAMA network open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed.
- Perceived effectiveness of messages to address cervical cancer screening barriers: An online experiment.PloS one · 2025Trial
- Integrating the Health Belief Model and the Theory of Planned Behavior to Decode Willingness to Pay for Cancer Screening: Evidence From Community-Based Cross-Sectional Surveys in China.Cancer medicine · 2026Article
- Response to Bates.JNCI cancer spectrum · 2026Article
- Acceptability and Feasibility of Home-Based Human Papillomavirus Self-Testing as Primary Screening for Cervical Cancer Detection in the State of Alabama.Journal of community health · 2026Article
- Rural-Urban Differences in Cervical Cancer Screening Patterns: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of the 2021 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS).The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2026Article
- Cervical Cancer and Sexually Transmitted Infections Screening Among Individuals with a Substance Use Disorder: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Population health management · 2026Article
- Trends in over- and under-screening for cervical cancer after EMR implementation in rural China.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Disparities in HPV/PAP Testing Among U.S. Women: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Healthcare Access, Internet Use, and Sociodemographic Factors.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Women's Preferences for Home-Based Self-Sampling or Clinic-Based Testing for Cervical Cancer Screening.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Declining trends but persistent disparities in cervical cancer mortality in the United States, 1999-2023.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Contemporary Status and Frontiers of Cervical Cancer Screening in the United States.Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2025Review
- HPV vaccination in community health organizations: what is going right and how can it be replicated?Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2025Observational
- Rural-urban disparities in cervical cancer screening uptake and its predictors among women aged 30-49 years in Ghana: a multivariate decomposition analysis.BMC women's health · 2025Article
- Article
- The Impact of COVID-19 on Cervical Cancer Screening in Primary Care.Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM · 2025Article
- Cancer screening and its associated factors in hypertensive individuals: new insights from the 2021 STEPs national study in Iran.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Article
- Evaluation of a multimodal ctDNA-based assay for detection of aggressive cancers lacking standard screening tests.Future oncology (London, England) · 2025Article
- Article
- HPV knowledge and non-adherence to cervical cancer screening before and following the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States.PLOS global public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Little nationally representative research has examined Papanicolaou testing rates from before the pandemic in 2019 through the COVID-19 pandemic in 2022. Papanicolaou testing rates among rural females are a concern as they have historically had lower screening rates than their urban counterparts. Objective: To examine the receipt of a Papanicolaou test in the past year among US females overall and females residing in rural and urban areas in 2019, 2020, and 2022. Design, Setting, and Participants: This repeated cross-sectional study used data from 3 years of the Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS), a nationally representative survey that asks respondents about cancer screenings, sources of health information, and health and health care technologies. Study participants were females aged 21 to 65 years. Individuals who received a Papanicolaou test more than 1 to 3 years prior to a HINTS interview were excluded as they were likely not due for a Papanicolaou test. Exposures: Survey year (2019, 2020, and 2022) and rural or urban residence were the main exposure variables. Main Outcomes and Measures: Self-reported receipt of a Papanicolaou test within the past year. Results: Among the 188 243 531 (weighted; 3706 unweighted) females included in the analysis, 12.5% lived in rural areas and 87.5% in urban areas. Participants had a mean (SE) age of 43.7 (0.27) years and were of Hispanic (18.8%), non-Hispanic Asian (5.2%), non-Hispanic Black (12.2%), non-Hispanic White (59.6%), or non-Hispanic other (4.1%) race and ethnicity. In 2022, unadjusted past-year Papanicolaou testing rates were significantly lower among rural vs urban residents (48.6% [95% CI, 39.2%-58.1%] vs 64.0% [95% CI, 60.0%-68.0%]; P < .001). Adjusted odds of past-year Papanicolaou testing were lower in 2022 than 2019 (odds ratio, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.52-0.95; P = .02). Conclusions and Relevance: This repeated cross-sectional study found that past-year Papanicolaou testing rates were lower in 2022 than 2019, pointing to a need to increase access to screenings to prevent an uptick in cervical cancer incidence. Rural-vs-urban differences in 2022 indicate a need to specifically target rural females.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.