Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38874894›Full record

ReviewDermatology and therapy2024

Biomarkers in Atopic Dermatitis.

Florence Libon, Juliette Caron, Arjen F Nikkels

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Dermatology and therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Development of a noninvasive device and method for measuring immune parameters in skin disease.JID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Florence LibonUnit of Dermato-Allergology, Department of Dermatology and Venerology, University Hospital of Liège-Liège, CHU of Sart Tilman, University of Liège, 4000, Liège, Belgium.
Juliette CaronAllergology and Therapeutic Education Service, Saint Vincent-de-Paul Hospital, Lille Cedex, France.
Arjen F NikkelsUnit of Dermato-Allergology, Department of Dermatology and Venerology, University Hospital of Liège-Liège, CHU of Sart Tilman, University of Liège, 4000, Liège, Belgium. af.nikkels@uliege.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5240-4806

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin condition. The pathogenesis involves genetic, environmental, and immunological factors as well as a barrier dysfunction of the epidermis. Biomarkers may play a significant role in diagnosis, severity assessment, and treatment monitoring of AD. They are categorizable into diagnostic and prognostic as well as severity and stratification biomarkers, offering the potential for a more personalized treatment approach. Although there have been tremendous therapeutic advancements with interleukin (IL) antagonists and Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, the domain of biomarkers still requires further research to clarify their place in the diagnosis and prognosis of AD to unravel a better scientific basis for personalized medical care for patients with AD. This article reviews the various biomarkers in relation to the different AD phenotypes and endotypes.

Indexed as

Atopic dermatitisBiomarkersDiagnosisEndotypePersonalized treatmentPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID38874894
PMCPMC11264653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.