Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38874729›Full record

ReviewAdvances in neurobiology2024

Endogenous Opioid Activity as the Mechanism of Action for Mitragyna speciosa (Kratom): The Current State of the Evidence.

Adina Bowe, Patrick L Kerr

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in neurobiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Adina BoweWest Virginia University School of Medicine-Charleston, Charleston, WV, USA. adbowe@hsc.wvu.edu.
Patrick L KerrWest Virginia University School of Medicine-Charleston, Charleston, WV, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Kratom (Mitragyna speciosa) is a substance derived from botanical compounds native to Southeast Asia. This substance has been cultivated predominantly in Thailand, Malaysia, Vietnam, and Myanmar, where it has historically been used in traditional medicine as a near panacea for several health problems. Such ritualistic use of kratom has been present for centuries; however, recreational use appears to have increased globally, especially in the United States. Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic studies have found that kratom demonstrates a unique parabolic, dose-dependent pattern of effects ranging from stimulation to opioid and analgesic effects. Pharmacological research indicates that kratom is both a mu opioid receptor (μ-OR; MOR) and a kappa opioid receptor (κ-OR; KOR) agonist, which mediates its analgesic effects. Other research suggests that kratom may simultaneously act on dopaminergic and serotonergic receptors, which mediate its stimulant effects. This chapter reviews the literature related to the structural, functional, and cultural characteristics of kratom use. We begin with an overview of current and historical patterns of kratom, followed by a review of data on the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of kratom thus far.

Indexed as

MitragynaPlant ExtractsReceptors, Opioid, kappaAnalgesics, OpioidAnimalsAsia, SoutheasternHumansReceptors, Opioid, muAnalgesics, OpioidPlant ExtractsReceptors, Opioid, kappaReceptors, Opioid, muEndogenous opioidsKratomMitragyna speciosaPharmacodynamicsPharmacokinetics

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.