ArticleIntensive care medicine experimental2024
Explainable Boosting Machine approach identifies risk factors for acute renal failure.
Article in Intensive care medicine experimental, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prediction of Acute Kidney Injury in Oncology: From Clinical Risk Scores to AI-Enabled Precision Onco-Nephrology.Cancers · 2026Review
- Article
- Interpretable machine learning models for predicting perioperative myocardial injury in non-cardiac surgery.European heart journal. Digital health · 2026Article
- From black box to glass box: explainable artificial intelligence for acute kidney injury prediction-a scoping review and the GLASS-AKI translational framework proposal.International urology and nephrology · 2026Review
- Explainable Boosting Machine in Sepsis Prediction Using Platelet Metabolomics: An Interpretable Machine Learning Approach.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence to investigate metabolomics data for precision medicine.Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society · 2026Review
- Using tree-based ensemble methods to produce a population-based mortality risk score in Ontario, Canada.PloS one · 2026Article
- Explainability in action: A metric-driven assessment of local explanations for healthcare tabular models.PloS one · 2026Article
- HearteXplain: explainable prediction of acute heart failure and identification of hematologic biomarkers using EBMs and Morris sensitivity analysis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- An Interpretable Machine Learning Framework for Analyzing the Interaction Between Cardiorespiratory Diseases and Meteo-Pollutant Sensor Data.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Explainable Boosting Machines Identify Key Metabolomic Biomarkers in Rheumatoid Arthritis.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Interpretable machine learning for precision cognitive aging.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2025Article
- Ensemble learning approach with explainable AI for improved heart disease prediction.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRisk stratification and outcome prediction are crucial for intensive care resource planning. In addressing the large data sets of intensive care unit (ICU) patients, we employed the Explainable Boosting Machine (EBM), a novel machine learning model, to identify determinants of acute kidney injury (AKI) in these patients. AKI significantly impacts outcomes in the critically ill.
methodsAn analysis of 3572 ICU patients was conducted. Variables such as average central venous pressure (CVP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), age, gender, and comorbidities were examined. This analysis combined traditional statistical methods with the EBM to gain a detailed understanding of AKI risk factors.
resultsOur analysis revealed chronic kidney disease, heart failure, arrhythmias, liver disease, and anemia as significant comorbidities influencing AKI risk, with liver disease and anemia being particularly impactful. Surgical factors were also key; lower GI surgery heightened AKI risk, while neurosurgery was associated with a reduced risk. EBM identified four crucial variables affecting AKI prediction: anemia, liver disease, and average CVP increased AKI risk, whereas neurosurgery decreased it. Age was a progressive risk factor, with risk escalating after the age of 50 years. Hemodynamic instability, marked by a MAP below 65 mmHg, was strongly linked to AKI, showcasing a threshold effect at 60 mmHg. Intriguingly, average CVP was a significant predictor, with a critical threshold at 10.7 mmHg.
conclusionUsing an Explainable Boosting Machine enhance the precision in AKI risk factors in ICU patients, providing a more nuanced understanding of known AKI risks. This approach allows for refined predictive modeling of AKI, effectively overcoming the limitations of traditional statistical models.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.