Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38874694›Full record

ArticleIntensive care medicine experimental2024

Explainable Boosting Machine approach identifies risk factors for acute renal failure.

Andreas Körner, Benjamin Sailer, Sibel Sari-Yavuz, Helene A Haeberle, Valbona Mirakaj, Alice Bernard, Peter Rosenberger, Michael Koeppen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Intensive care medicine experimental, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Artificial intelligence to investigate metabolomics data for precision medicine.Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Interpretable machine learning for precision cognitive aging.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Andreas KörnerDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital, Hoppe-Seyler-Straße 3, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.
Benjamin SailerMedical Data Integration Center, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Sibel Sari-YavuzDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital, Hoppe-Seyler-Straße 3, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.
Helene A HaeberleDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital, Hoppe-Seyler-Straße 3, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.
Valbona MirakajDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital, Hoppe-Seyler-Straße 3, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.
Alice BernardDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital, Hoppe-Seyler-Straße 3, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.
Peter RosenbergerDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital, Hoppe-Seyler-Straße 3, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.
Michael KoeppenDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital, Hoppe-Seyler-Straße 3, 72076, Tübingen, Germany. michael.koeppen@med.uni-tuebingen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5002-1286

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 01ZZ1804DDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft KO 6563/1-1Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft MI 1506-4-2Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft RO 3671/14-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRisk stratification and outcome prediction are crucial for intensive care resource planning. In addressing the large data sets of intensive care unit (ICU) patients, we employed the Explainable Boosting Machine (EBM), a novel machine learning model, to identify determinants of acute kidney injury (AKI) in these patients. AKI significantly impacts outcomes in the critically ill.

methodsAn analysis of 3572 ICU patients was conducted. Variables such as average central venous pressure (CVP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), age, gender, and comorbidities were examined. This analysis combined traditional statistical methods with the EBM to gain a detailed understanding of AKI risk factors.

resultsOur analysis revealed chronic kidney disease, heart failure, arrhythmias, liver disease, and anemia as significant comorbidities influencing AKI risk, with liver disease and anemia being particularly impactful. Surgical factors were also key; lower GI surgery heightened AKI risk, while neurosurgery was associated with a reduced risk. EBM identified four crucial variables affecting AKI prediction: anemia, liver disease, and average CVP increased AKI risk, whereas neurosurgery decreased it. Age was a progressive risk factor, with risk escalating after the age of 50 years. Hemodynamic instability, marked by a MAP below 65 mmHg, was strongly linked to AKI, showcasing a threshold effect at 60 mmHg. Intriguingly, average CVP was a significant predictor, with a critical threshold at 10.7 mmHg.

conclusionUsing an Explainable Boosting Machine enhance the precision in AKI risk factors in ICU patients, providing a more nuanced understanding of known AKI risks. This approach allows for refined predictive modeling of AKI, effectively overcoming the limitations of traditional statistical models.

Identifiers

PMID38874694
PMCPMC11178719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.