ArticleAging2024
Genetically predicted 91 circulating inflammatory proteins in relation to risk of urological malignancies: a Mendelian randomization study.
Article in Aging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Identification of novel protein markers and therapeutic targets for common urological cancers by integrating large-scale human plasma proteome with the genome.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Integrating analysis of multi-omics summary data identifies novel plasma protein biomarkers and drug targets for bladder cancer.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Relationship Between the Levels of 91 Circulating Inflammatory Proteins and Ovarian-Related Diseases: A Bidirectional Mendelian Randomization Study.International journal of women's health · 2025Article
- Association Between Glaucoma and Brain Structural Connectivity Based on Diffusion Tensor Tractography: A Bidirectional Mendelian Randomization Study.Brain sciences · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUrological malignancies, including kidney, bladder, and prostate cancer, are major health concerns worldwide. Inflammation has been implicated in the pathogenesis of these cancers, and circulating inflammatory proteins may play a role in their development. However, the causal relationship between specific plasma proteins and urological malignancies remains unclear.
methodsWe performed a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis using summary statistics from genome-wide association studies (GWAS). Instrumental variables representing genetic variants associated with circulating inflammatory proteins were used to infer causality on the risk of kidney, bladder, and prostate cancer. Four MR methods were utilized to provide robust effect estimates.
resultsOur analysis identified several plasma proteins associated with a lower risk of kidney and bladder cancer, including Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E-binding protein 1, Caspase 8, Natural killer cell receptor 2B4, and Tumor necrosis factor ligand superfamily member 12. However, after adjusting for multiple testing, these associations did not remain statistically significant. For prostate cancer, CUB domain-containing protein 1 and Interleukin-10 receptor subunit beta were found to be protective, while Glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor and SIR2-like protein 2 were identified as risk factors. After FDR adjustment, none of the inflammatory proteins were found to be significantly associated with a lower risk of prostate cancer.
conclusionOur findings suggest that certain plasma proteins may be involved in the development of urological malignancies. Mendelian randomization provides a useful framework for investigating causal relationships between inflammatory proteins and urological cancers, offering potential insights into their underlying biology and therapeutic targets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.