ReviewCurrent pharmaceutical design2024
Leveraging Artificial Intelligence for Synergies in Drug Discovery: From Computers to Clinics.
Review in Current pharmaceutical design, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Correlation does not equal causation: the imperative of causal inference in machine learning models for immunotherapy.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence-assisted photodynamic diagnosis and photodynamic therapy against cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- The Five-Decade Journey of Small Cell Lung Cancer.Cancer communications (London, England) · 2026Review
- Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Biotech Drug Discovery and Product Development.MedComm · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence-, organoid-, and organ-on-chip-powered models to improve pre-clinical animal testing of vaccines and immunotherapeutics: potential, progress, and challenges.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Over the period of the preceding decade, artificial intelligence (AI) has proved an outstanding performance in entire dimensions of science including pharmaceutical sciences. AI uses the concept of machine learning (ML), deep learning (DL), and neural networks (NNs) approaches for novel algorithm and hypothesis development by training the machines in multiple ways. AI-based drug development from molecule identification to clinical approval tremendously reduces the cost of development and the time over conventional methods. The COVID-19 vaccine development and approval by regulatory agencies within 1-2 years is the finest example of drug development. Hence, AI is fast becoming a boon for scientific researchers to streamline their advanced discoveries. AI-based FDA-approved nanomedicines perform well as target selective, synergistic therapies, recolonize the theragnostic pharmaceutical stream, and significantly improve drug research outcomes. This comprehensive review delves into the fundamental aspects of AI along with its applications in the realm of pharmaceutical life sciences. It explores AI's role in crucial areas such as drug designing, drug discovery and development, traditional Chinese medicine, integration of multi-omics data, as well as investigations into drug repurposing and polypharmacology studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38874046What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.