Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38873842›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2024

Investigating the potential of catheter-assisted pulsed focused ultrasound ablation for atherosclerotic plaques.

Abhirup Samaddar, Rohit Singh, Xinmai Yang, Koji C Ebersole, M Laird Forrest

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Abhirup SamaddarInstitute for Bioengineering Research and Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, USA.
Rohit SinghInstitute for Bioengineering Research and Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, USA.
Xinmai YangInstitute for Bioengineering Research and Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, USA.
Koji C EbersoleDepartment of Neurosurgery, the University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA.
M Laird ForrestDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, the University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, USA.

Funding

Midwest Biomedical Accelerator Consortium: MBArCU01HL152410 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA · PI FAY, WILLIAM P, GRANT, SHEILA ANN · 2019 to 2023
$5.6M
NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL152410
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAtherosclerosis is a condition in which an adhesive substance called plaque accumulates over time inside the arteries. Plaque buildup results in the constriction of arteries, causing a shortage of blood supply to tissues and organs. Removing atherosclerotic plaques controls the development of acute ischemic stroke and heart diseases. It remains imperative for positive patient outcomes. PURPOSE: This study sought to develop a minimally invasive technique for removing arterial plaques by applying focused ultrasound (FUS) energy on the metal surface of a nitinol catheter wire to induce inertial cavitation. The induced cavitation can deplete plaque mechanically inside the arteries, leading towards improved recanalization of blood vessels.

methodsThe enhanced cavitation effect induced by combining FUS with a metal catheter was first verified by exposing agar phantom gels with or without a 0.9-mm diameter nitinol wire to an acoustic field produced by a 0.5-MHz FUS transducer. The phenomenon was further confirmed in pork belly fat samples with or without a 3-mm diameter nitinol catheter wire. Cavitation was monitored by detecting the peaks of emitted ultrasound signals from the samples using a passive cavitation detector (PCD). Cavitation threshold values were determined by observing the jump in the peak amplitude of signals received by the PCD when the applied FUS peak negative pressure (PNP) increased. To simulate arterial plaque removal, FUS with or without a catheter was used to remove tissues from pork belly fat samples and the lipid cores of human atherosclerotic plaque samples using 2500-cycle FUS bursts at 10% duty cycle and a burst repetition rate of 20 Hz. Treatment outcomes were quantified by subtracting the weight of samples before treatment from the weight of samples after treatment. All measurements were repeated 5 times (n = 5) unless otherwise indicated, and paired t-tests were used to compare the means of two groups. A p-value of <0.05 will be considered significant.

resultsOur results showed that with a nitinol wire, the cavitation threshold in agar phantoms was reduced to 2.6 MPa from 4.3 MPa PNP when there was no nitinol wire in the focal region of FUS. For pork belly fat samples, cavitation threshold values were 1.0 and 2.0 MPa PNP, with and without a catheter wire, respectively. Pork belly fat tissues and lipid cores of atherosclerotic plaques were depleted at the interface between a catheter and the samples at 2 and 4 MPa FUS PNP, respectively. The results showed that with a catheter wire in the focal region of a 3-min FUS treatment session, 24.7 and 25.6 mg of lipid tissues were removed from pork belly fat and human atherosclerotic samples, respectively. In contrast, the FUS-only group showed no reduction in sample weight. The differences between FUS-only and FUS-plus-catheter groups were statistically significant (p < 0.001 for the treatment on pork belly samples, and p < 0.01 for the treatment on human atherosclerotic samples).

conclusionThis study demonstrated the feasibility of catheter-assisted FUS therapy for removing atherosclerotic plaques.

Indexed as

Plaque, AtheroscleroticAnimalsCathetersHigh-Intensity Focused Ultrasound AblationHumansPhantoms, ImagingSwineatherosclerosiscathetercavitationfocused ultrasound

Identifiers

PMID38873842
PMCPMC11409400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.