Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38873725›Full record

SynthesisActa obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica2024

Placental architectural characteristics following laser ablation within monochorionic twins complicated by twin-twin transfusion syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes.

Jack Hamer, Nashwa Eltaweel, Rebecca Man, Matilde Rogerson, Victoria Hodgetts Morton, R Katie Morris, Tamas Marton, Leo Gurney

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jack HamerInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1725-0116
Nashwa EltaweelUniversity Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK.
Rebecca ManInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Matilde RogersonBirmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Victoria Hodgetts MortonInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9817-4313
R Katie MorrisInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Tamas MartonBirmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Leo GurneyBirmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTwin-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS) complicates approximately 10%-15% of all monochorionic twin pregnancies. The aim of this review was to evaluate the placental architectural characteristics within TTTS twins following laser and elucidate their impact on fetal outcomes and operative success. MATERIAL AND

methodsFive databases were searched from inception to August 2023. Studies detailing post-delivery placental analysis within TTTS twins post-laser were included. Studies were categorized into two main groups: (1) residual anastomoses following laser and (2) abnormal cord insertion: either velamentous and/or marginal or proximate. The primary outcome was to determine the proportion of TTTS placentas with residual anastomoses and abnormal cord insertions post-laser. Secondary outcomes included assessing residual anastomoses on post-laser fetal outcomes and assessing the relationship between abnormal cord insertion and TTTS development. Study bias was critiqued using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklists and Cochrane risk of bias tool. Random-effects meta-analysis was used, and results were reported as pooled proportions or odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). PROSPERO registration: CRD42023476875.

resultsTwenty-six studies, comprising 4013 monochorionic twins, were included for analysis. The proportion of TTTS placentas with residual anastomoses following laser was 24% (95% CI, 0.12-0.41), with a mean and standard deviation of 4.03 ± 2.95 anastomoses per placenta. Post-laser residual anastomoses were significantly associated with intrauterine fetal death (OR, 2.38 [95% CI, 1.33-4.26]), neonatal death (OR, 3.37 [95% CI, 1.65-6.88]), recurrent TTTS (OR, 24.33 [95% CI, 6.64-89.12]), and twin anemia polycythemia sequence (OR, 13.54 [95% CI, 6.36-28.85]). Combined abnormal cord (velamentous and marginal), velamentous cord, and marginal cord insertions within one or both twins following laser were reported at rates of 49% (95% CI, 0.39-0.59), 27% (95% CI, 0.18-0.38), and 28% (95% CI, 0.21-0.36), respectively. Combined, velamentous and marginal cord insertions were not significantly associated with TTTS twins requiring laser (p = 0.72, p = 0.38, and p = 0.71, respectively) vs non-TTTS monochorionic twins.

conclusionsTo the best of our knowledge, this is the first review to conjointly explore outcomes of residual anastomoses and abnormal cord insertions within TTTS twins following laser. A large prospective study is necessitated to assess the relationship between abnormal cord insertion and residual anastomoses development post-laser.

Indexed as

Fetofetal TransfusionLaser TherapyPlacentaPregnancy, TwinFemaleHumansPregnancyPregnancy OutcomeTwins, Monozygoticabnormal cord insertionanastomosisartery–vein anastomosislaser ablationmarginal cordplacentaresidual anastomosesTTTStwin–twin transfusion syndromevelamentous cord

Identifiers

PMID38873725
PMCPMC11502458

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.