Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38873619›Full record

ArticleJournal of CME2024

Impact of Educational Activity Formats, Online or In-Person, on the Intention of Medical Specialists to Adopt a Clinical Behaviour: A Comparative Study.

Gloria Ayivi-Vinz, Martin Tremblay, Souleymane Gadio, Suélène Georgina Dofara, Sam J Daniel, Denis Talbot, France Légaré

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of CME, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Gloria Ayivi-VinzFaculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0947-7708
Martin TremblayDirection du Développement Professionnel Continu, Fédération des Médecins Spécialistes du Québec, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4413-5962
Souleymane GadioVITAM - Centre de recherche en santé durable, CIUSSS de la Capitale-Nationale, Quebec, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1113-4720
Suélène Georgina DofaraCanada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation, Université Laval, Quebec, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-0537-8965
Sam J DanielDirection du Développement Professionnel Continu, Fédération des Médecins Spécialistes du Québec, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9698-9519
Denis TalbotFaculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0431-3314
France LégaréFaculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2296-6696

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

COVID-19 accelerated continuing professional development (CPD) delivered online. We aimed to compare the impact of in-person versus online CPD courses on medical specialists' behavioural intentions and subsequent behaviour. In this comparative before-and-after study, medical specialists attended in-person courses on nine clinical topics. A second group attended an adapted online version of these courses. Behavioural intention and its psychosocial determinants were measured before and immediately after the courses. Behaviour change was measured six months later. Generalised estimating equation (GEE) models were used to compare the impact of course formats. A total of 82/206 in-person registrants (mean age: 52±10 years; 50% men) and 318/506 on-line registrants (mean age: 49±12 years; men: 63%) participated. Mean intention before in-person courses was 5.99±1.31 and 6.43±0.80 afterwards (average intention gain 0.44, CI: 0.16-0.74;

Indexed as

continuing medical educationcontinuing professional developmentdistance educationin-person learningOnline learning

Identifiers

PMID38873619
PMCPMC11172255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.