Synergy quality assessment of muscle modules for determining learning performance using a realistic musculoskeletal model.

How our central nervous system efficiently controls our complex musculoskeletal system is still debated. The muscle synergy hypothesis is proposed to simplify this complex system by assuming the existence of functional neural modules that coordinate several muscles. Modularity based on muscle synergies can facilitate motor learning without compromising task performance. However, the effectiveness of modularity in motor control remains debated. This ambiguity can, in part, stem from overlooking that the performance of modularity depends on the mechanical aspects of modules of interest, such as the torque the modules exert. To address this issue, this study introduces two criteria to evaluate the quality of module sets based on commonly used performance metrics in motor learning studies: the accuracy of torque production and learning speed. One evaluates the regularity in the direction of mechanical torque the modules exert, while the other evaluates the evenness of its magnitude. For verification of our criteria, we simulated motor learning of torque production tasks in a realistic musculoskeletal system of the upper arm using feed-forward neural networks while changing the control conditions. We found that the proposed criteria successfully explain the tendency of learning performance in various control conditions. These result suggest that regularity in the direction of and evenness in magnitude of mechanical torque of utilized modules are significant factor for determining learning performance. Although the criteria were originally conceived for an error-based learning scheme, the approach to pursue which set of modules is better for motor control can have significant implications in other studies of modularity in general.