ArticleJournal of ophthalmology2024
Retrospective Study of Diabetic Retinopathy and Macular Edema in Southern Part of Bangladesh.
Article in Journal of ophthalmology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Diabetic mellitus is a vision-threatening disease because it causes diabetic retinopathy worldwide. The main focus of this research is to determine the prevalence and assess the visual outcome in diabetic retinopathy and macular edema patients by injecting Bevacizumab clinically. Methods: This hospital-based trial case was conducted in Khulna BNSB Eye Hospital, Bangladesh. This study is based on a prospective cohort with a population of macular edema in 41 eyes of 25 diabetic patients, of whom 94 were diagnosed with diabetic retinopathy in 320 type 2 diabetes mellitus patients. The treating physician inserts 1.25 mg (0.05 ml) into the patient's eye. We have used optical coherence tomography (OCT) and colour fundus photography (CFP) for an eye check performed on all patients before and after the injection of Bevacizumab. The method results analyze the effects of the technique using IBM SPSS 25. Results: The study population selected 25 patients with 41 eyes for clinical investigation by injection of Bevacizumab. The net effects of this study on five eyes with macular edema were entirely resolved. It was BCVA from 6/6 to 6/9. The 29 eyes were partially resolved, which is called improved visual acuity, and BCVA was 6/12 to 6/60. In the case of seven eyes, we found that the vision did not change before or after the Avastin injection. No change was seen in seven eyes of macular edema due to the effects of the Avastin injection before and after. Conclusions: In clinical trial-based research, Bevacizumab (Avastin) is best effective for diabetic retinopathy (DR) and diabetic macular edema (DME) patients.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.