Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38873255›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2024

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: an Italian monocentric experience on the health assessment and eligibility of adult-related donors.

Caterina Giovanna Valentini, Sara Ceglie, Federica Fatone, Elisabetta Metafuni, Claudio Pellegrino, Patrizia Chiusolo, Simona Sica, Luciana Teofili

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Caterina Giovanna ValentiniDipartimento di Scienze di Laboratorio ed Ematologiche, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Sara CeglieDipartimento di Scienze di Laboratorio ed Ematologiche, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Federica FatoneDipartimento di Scienze di Laboratorio ed Ematologiche, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Elisabetta MetafuniDipartimento di Scienze di Laboratorio ed Ematologiche, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Claudio PellegrinoDipartimento di Scienze di Laboratorio ed Ematologiche, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Patrizia ChiusoloDipartimento di Scienze di Laboratorio ed Ematologiche, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Simona SicaDipartimento di Scienze di Laboratorio ed Ematologiche, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Luciana TeofiliDipartimento di Scienze di Laboratorio ed Ematologiche, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Indications for HSCT are increasing worldwide, paralleled by a growing demand for donors of therapeutic cells. Methods: Herein, we report our real-world experience of adult HPC donor assessment during a 5-year study period (2018-2023): we have retrospectively revised data of 455 potential related stem cell donors, consecutively evaluated at our center. Donor medical history was assessed by a questionnaire and an interview with a trained physician experienced in donation procedures to evaluate donor fitness and medical history. Pre-existing health disorders were fully investigated. Behavioral risk factors for communicable infectious diseases were also routinely explored. Results and discussion: Overall, 351 donors were finally assessed as eligible for HPC donation, and 233 underwent stem cell collection, 158 through apheresis from mobilized peripheral blood, and 75 through bone marrow harvest. Among them, 27 donors were selected despite the presence of pre-existing health conditions, which would be potential exclusion criteria for unrelated donors: 16 suffered from well-controlled cardiovascular diseases (CVD) and 11 from allergic diathesis. Most of the selected donors with pre-existing disorders were candidates for apheresis HPC collection (21, 77.8%), while only six (22.2%) underwent BM harvest. We then analyzed the data relative to the corresponding 233 allogeneic HSCT to explore if the presence of pre-existing diseases in the donors could show any association with transplant characteristics. Transplants from CVD and allergy donors showed no significant disparities in comparison with those from healthy donors. A significant difference emerged regarding the disease severity, with a higher proportion of patients with high/very high disease risk index (DRI) among those receiving grafts from CVD donors (68.7% in transplants from CVD donors versus 36.0% in transplants from healthy donors, p=0.005). Multivariate analysis confirmed that high/very high DRI patients had an increased probability of receiving donations from CVD donors (OR, 4.89; 95%CI, 1.15-20.86; p=0.031). Among donors with well-controlled pre-existing conditions, no adverse events were recorded during stem cell collection or at follow-up. Our results suggest that in patients at high risk for relapse requiring a prompt allogeneic transplant, a familiar donor might be accepted for HPC apheresis donation on less strict criteria than unrelated donors, without risk for both donor and patient.

Indexed as

donor assessmenteligibility criteriaengraftmenthematopoietic stem cell transplantationrelated donor

Identifiers

PMID38873255
PMCPMC11169656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.