ArticleFrontiers in oncology2024
Prognostic models for colorectal cancer recurrence using carcinoembryonic antigen measurements.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Predictive Performance of Radiomics-Based Machine Learning for Colorectal Cancer Recurrence Risk: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JMIR medical informatics · 2025Pooled it
- Comprehensive Landscape of Diagnostic, Prognostic and Predictive Biomarkers in Colorectal Cancer: From Genomics to Multi-Omics Integration in Precision Medicine.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Significance of CEA Dynamics and Systemic Inflammatory Markers in HER2-Positive Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients Undergoing First-Line Chemotherapy: A Real-World Cohort Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Personalized surveillance in colorectal cancer: Integrating circulating tumor DNA and artificial intelligence into post-treatment follow-up.World journal of gastroenterology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most prevalent cancers worldwide. A considerable percentage of patients who undergo surgery with curative intent will experience cancer recurrence. Early identification of individuals with a higher risk of recurrence is crucial for healthcare professionals to intervene promptly and devise appropriate treatment strategies. In this study, we developed prognostic models for CRC recurrence using machine learning models on a limited number of CEA measurements. Method: A dataset of 1927 patients diagnosed with Stage I-III CRC and referred to Zuyderland Hospital for surgery between 2008 and 2016 was utilized. Machine learning models were trained using this comprehensive dataset, which included demographic details, clinicopathological factors, and serial measurements of Carcinoembryonic Antigen (CEA). In this study, the predictive performance of these models was assessed, and the key prognostic factors influencing colorectal cancer (CRC) recurrence were pinpointed. Result: Among the evaluated models, the gradient boosting classifier demonstrated superior performance, achieving an Area Under the Curve (AUC) score of 0.81 and a balanced accuracy rate of 0.73. Recurrence prediction was shown to be feasible with an AUC of 0.71 when using only five post-operative CEA measurements. Furthermore, key factors influencing recurrence were identified and elucidated. Conclusion: This study shows the transformative role of machine learning in recurrence prediction for CRC, particularly by investigating the minimum number of CEA measurements required for effective recurrence prediction. This approach not only contributes to the optimization of clinical workflows but also facilitates the development of more effective, individualized treatment plans, thereby laying the groundwork for future advancements in this area. Future directions involve validating these models in larger and more diverse cohorts. Building on these efforts, our ultimate goal is to develop a risk-based follow-up strategy that can improve patient outcomes and enhance healthcare efficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.