Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38873195›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2024

Current situation and issues regarding termination of risk management plans in Japan.

Natsuko Kameyama, Aoi Hosaka, Hideki Maeda

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Important potential risks not reflected in Japanese drug labeling: implications for risk management plan termination.Daru : journal of Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Natsuko KameyamaDepartment of Regulatory Science, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Science, Meiji Pharmaceutical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Aoi HosakaDepartment of Regulatory Science, Faculty of Pharmacy, Meiji Pharmaceutical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Hideki MaedaDepartment of Regulatory Science, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Science, Meiji Pharmaceutical University, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: In Japan, drugs approved after the 2013 implementation of the risk management plan (RMP) have the opportunity to be evaluated for RMP termination. However, the guidelines for risk management following the termination of an RMP remain unclear. Drugs are evaluated for RMP termination at the timing of reexamination. Reexamination system is unique to Japan and initiated in 1979, verifies the approved efficacy and safety of a newly marketed drug based on the data from its actual use over a certain period. This study investigated drugs in Japan for which the RMP requirement was lifted upon reexamination and those for which it was not. We organized their characteristics and considered future issues. Methods: We identified drugs with RMPs and obtained information on RMP termination from the public website of the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA). The survey period spanned 10 years, from April 2013, when the RMP was implemented, to March 2023. Results: During the survey period, 72 drugs with RMPs completed reexamination in Japan. The RMP requirement was lifted for 69 drugs (95.8%) and remained for three drugs (4.2%). Upon RMP termination, 16 out of 69 drugs (23.2%) had important potential risks not listed in the package insert, with malignant neoplasm being the most common. Eleven drugs (15.9%) had important missing information not listed in the package insert, with the most common being the impact on cardiovascular risk. Two drugs (2.9%) had ongoing additional pharmacovigilance activities, and 43 drugs (62.3%) had additional risk minimization activities. Conclusion: Upon reexamination completion, the RMP requirement was lifted for many drugs and remained for a few. Should safety concerns require continued attention following reexamination, we advocate for the continuation of the RMP, guided by more explicit rules. In light of the harmonization of RMP rules with those of other countries, there is a desire for enhanced drug safety management.

Indexed as

drug safetyJapanese drug regulatory systempharmacovigilancereexamination systemrisk management planRMP terminationsafety concerns

Identifiers

PMID38873195
PMCPMC11169920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.