Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38873024›Full record

ArticleAcademia biology2024

Natural selection and evolution: evolving concepts.

Andre J van Wijnen, Eric A Lewallen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Academia biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Andre J van WijnenDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, 05405, USA.
Eric A LewallenDepartment of Biological Sciences, Hampton University, Hampton, VA, 23668, USA.

Funding

Molecular Control of Bone FormationR01AR049069 · NIAMS · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI WESTENDORF, JENNIFER J · 2003 to 2021
$5.8M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR049069
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many recent studies in evolutionary biology have expanded and refined definitions of biological evolution and natural selection. Current evolutionary models incorporate different adaptive and non-adaptive processes based on molecular genetic changes and how DNA is modified over time in unicellular species, or in germline versus somatic cells in metazoan species. Cogent arguments can be raised for the view that natural selection should be considered a biological law, consistent with quantitative mathematical equations that describe the fitness of individuals, as well as variations within and among populations. Evolution is an overarching framework that incorporates the laws of natural selection and clarifies why phenotypic variation can increase in prevalence and result in species adaptations. The conceptual framework for biological evolution incorporates many cohesive principles that collectively have a predictive value. This framework will continue to evolve with improvements in high-resolution technologies that enable us to examine both adaptive and non-adaptive changes that drive biological phenotypes.

Indexed as

biological lawbiological theoryfitnessgenotypephenotype

Identifiers

PMID38873024
PMCPMC11175172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.