Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38872977›Full record

ReviewRegenerative therapy2024

Exploring calcium-free alternatives in endochondral bone repair tested on

William Cárdenas-Aguazaco, Adriana Lorena Lara-Bertrand, Leonardo Prieto-Abello, Nicolás Barreto-López, Bernardo Camacho, Ingrid Silva-Cote

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Regenerative therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

William Cárdenas-AguazacoUnidad de Ingeniería Tisular, Instituto Distrital de Ciencia, Biotecnología e Innovación en Salud-IDCBIS, Colombia.
Adriana Lorena Lara-BertrandUnidad de Ingeniería Tisular, Instituto Distrital de Ciencia, Biotecnología e Innovación en Salud-IDCBIS, Colombia.
Leonardo Prieto-AbelloUnidad de Ingeniería Tisular, Instituto Distrital de Ciencia, Biotecnología e Innovación en Salud-IDCBIS, Colombia.
Nicolás Barreto-LópezUnidad de Ingeniería Tisular, Instituto Distrital de Ciencia, Biotecnología e Innovación en Salud-IDCBIS, Colombia.
Bernardo CamachoUnidad de Ingeniería Tisular, Instituto Distrital de Ciencia, Biotecnología e Innovación en Salud-IDCBIS, Colombia.
Ingrid Silva-CoteUnidad de Ingeniería Tisular, Instituto Distrital de Ciencia, Biotecnología e Innovación en Salud-IDCBIS, Colombia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bone repair via endochondral ossification is a complex process for the critical size reparation of bone defects. Tissue engineering strategies are being developed as alternative treatments to autografts or allografts. Most approaches to bone regeneration involve the use of calcium composites. However, exploring calcium-free alternatives in endochondral bone repair has emerged as a promising way to contribute to bone healing. By analyzing researches from the last ten years, this review identifies the potential benefits of such alternatives compared to traditional calcium-based approaches. Understanding the impact of calcium-free alternatives on endochondral bone repair can have profound implications for orthopedic and regenerative medicine. This review evaluates the efficacy of calcium-free alternatives in endochondral bone repair through

Indexed as

BiomaterialsBone defectsCalcium-free alternativesCellsEndochondral ossificationRegeneration

Identifiers

PMID38872977
PMCPMC11169084

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.