Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38872956›Full record

ArticleACS sustainable chemistry & engineering2024

Comparing Environmental Impacts of Single-Junction Silicon and Silicon/Perovskite Tandem Photovoltaics-A Prospective Life Cycle Assessment.

Mitchell K van der Hulst, Dorottya Magoss, Yiri Massop, Sjoerd Veenstra, Niels van Loon, Ilker Dogan, Gianluca Coletti, Mirjam Theelen, Selwyn Hoeks, Mark A J Huijbregts and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS sustainable chemistry & engineering, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Learning Curves in Prospective Life Cycle Assessment.Environmental science & technology · 2025
    Article
  6. Looking to the Future: Prospective Life Cycle Assessment of Emerging Technologies.Chemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Mitchell K van der HulstDepartment of Environmental Science, Radboud Institute for Biological and Environmental Sciences, Radboud University, P.O. Box 9010, Nijmegen 6500 GL, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9803-971X
Dorottya MagossDepartment of Environmental Science, Radboud Institute for Biological and Environmental Sciences, Radboud University, P.O. Box 9010, Nijmegen 6500 GL, The Netherlands.
Yiri MassopDepartment of Environmental Science, Radboud Institute for Biological and Environmental Sciences, Radboud University, P.O. Box 9010, Nijmegen 6500 GL, The Netherlands.
Sjoerd VeenstraTNO Partner of Solliance, High Tech Campus 21, Eindhoven 5656 AE, The Netherlands.
Niels van LoonTNO Partner of Solliance, High Tech Campus 21, Eindhoven 5656 AE, The Netherlands.
Ilker DoganTNO Partner of Solliance, High Tech Campus 21, Eindhoven 5656 AE, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4245-787X
Gianluca ColettiSchool of Photovoltaic and Renewable Energy Engineering, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5037-4455
Mirjam TheelenTNO Partner of Solliance, High Tech Campus 21, Eindhoven 5656 AE, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3864-1933
Selwyn HoeksDepartment of Environmental Science, Radboud Institute for Biological and Environmental Sciences, Radboud University, P.O. Box 9010, Nijmegen 6500 GL, The Netherlands.
Mark A J HuijbregtsDepartment of Environmental Science, Radboud Institute for Biological and Environmental Sciences, Radboud University, P.O. Box 9010, Nijmegen 6500 GL, The Netherlands.
Rosalie van ZelmDepartment of Environmental Science, Radboud Institute for Biological and Environmental Sciences, Radboud University, P.O. Box 9010, Nijmegen 6500 GL, The Netherlands.
Mara HauckExpertise Group Circularity & Sustainability Impact, TNO, P.O. Box 80015, Utrecht 3508 TA, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tandem photovoltaics applying perovskite on silicon are considered to be a possible route to sustaining continuous efficiency improvements and price reductions. A meaningful market share for such tandems is, however, at least a decade away. Herein, a comprehensive prospective life cycle assessment was conducted, comparing the full life cycle of monofacial and bifacial silicon/perovskite tandem panels with single-junction silicon panels produced up to 2050. The end-of-life included the recovery of silicon and silver. Climate change impacts per kilowatt hour were projected to decrease by two-thirds over time. Tandem panels are expected to reach impacts of 8-10 g CO

Identifiers

PMID38872956
PMCPMC11167636

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.