ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2024
PhyberSIM: a tool for the generation of ground truth to evaluate brain fiber clustering algorithms.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging tractography is a non-invasive technique that produces a collection of streamlines representing the main white matter bundle trajectories. Methods, such as fiber clustering algorithms, are important in computational neuroscience and have been the basis of several white matter analysis methods and studies. Nevertheless, these clustering methods face the challenge of the absence of ground truth of white matter fibers, making their evaluation difficult. As an alternative solution, we present an innovative brain fiber bundle simulator that uses spline curves for fiber representation. The methodology uses a tubular model for the bundle simulation based on a bundle centroid and five radii along the bundle. The algorithm was tested by simulating 28 Deep White Matter atlas bundles, leading to low inter-bundle distances and high intersection percentages between the original and simulated bundles. To prove the utility of the simulator, we created three whole-brain datasets containing different numbers of fiber bundles to assess the quality performance of QuickBundles and Fast Fiber Clustering algorithms using five clustering metrics. Our results indicate that QuickBundles tends to split less and Fast Fiber Clustering tends to merge less, which is consistent with their expected behavior. The performance of both algorithms decreases when the number of bundles is increased due to higher bundle crossings. Additionally, the two algorithms exhibit robust behavior with input data permutation. To our knowledge, this is the first whole-brain fiber bundle simulator capable of assessing fiber clustering algorithms with realistic data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.