Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38872923›Full record

ArticleWellcome open research2021

The ALSPAC fetal and neonatal resource: detailed data abstracted from the clinical records of the new-born.

Karen Birmingham, Yasmin Iles-Caven, Kate Northstone, Jean Golding

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Wellcome open research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Karen BirminghamPopulation Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, Avon, BS8 2BN, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2826-3307
Yasmin Iles-CavenPopulation Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, Avon, BS8 2BN, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9965-9133
Kate NorthstonePopulation Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, Avon, BS8 2BN, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0602-1983
Jean GoldingPopulation Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, Avon, BS8 2BN, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2826-3307

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In a previous Data Note, we outlined the data obtained from clinical obstetric records concerning many details of the pregnancies resulting in the births of the children in the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC). Here we describe the data that have been abstracted from medical records concerning the fetus and neonate. Full details concerning the selection biases regarding the data abstracted are outlined in the previous Data Note. The records that have been abstracted, and described in this Data Note, concern the health of the fetus (measured in relation to the results of fetal monitoring, presentation at various stages of pregnancy, and the method of delivery) as well as the status of the newborn immediately post-delivery. Details of signs, symptoms and treatments of this population of new-born babies, as recorded in the clinical records, are described for the time during which they were in hospital or under the care of a designated midwife. These data add depth to the information collected from elsewhere concerning this period of the child's life: from the questionnaires completed at the time by the mother; and clinical details from neonatal intensive or special care units which will be detailed in a further Data Note.

Indexed as

ALSPACDeliveryFetusLabourNeonate

Identifiers

PMID38872923
PMCPMC11170066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.