ArticleOncology letters2024
First‑line programmed cell death 1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy vs. standard treatment in patients with recurrent or metastatic oral squamous cell carcinoma: A retrospective cohort study.
Article in Oncology letters, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Research progress on carcinogenic factors and personalized treatment of oral cancer.Discover oncology · 2025Review
- Complex IIa formation and ABC transporters determine sensitivity of OSCC to Smac mimetics.Cell death & disease · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) inhibitor revives the killing effect of immune cells to prevent tumor progression. The present study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of first-line PD-1 inhibitor + chemotherapy vs. standard treatment in recurrent or metastatic (R/M) oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). A total of 51 patients with R/M OSCC were reviewed and divided into the PD-1 inhibitor + chemotherapy (n=21) and standard treatment (n=30) groups based on their actual treatments. The results of the present study demonstrated that the objective response rate (52.4 vs. 36.7%, P=0.265) and disease control rate (81.0 vs. 70.0%, P=0.377) were numerically elevated in the PD-1 inhibitor + chemotherapy group compared with those in the standard treatment group; however, the results did not reach statistical significance. The progression-free survival (PFS) was numerically increased (without statistical significance) in the PD-1 inhibitor + chemotherapy group compared with that of the standard treatment group (P=0.057). Specifically, the PD-1 inhibitor + chemotherapy group and the standard treatment group exhibited a median [95% confidence interval (CI)] PFS duration of 6.7 (1.6-11.8) and 5.2 (3.4-7.0) months, respectively. In addition, the PD-1 inhibitor + chemotherapy group demonstrated increased overall survival (OS) compared with that of the standard treatment group (P=0.032). Specifically, the PD-1 inhibitor + chemotherapy group and the standard treatment group exhibited a median (95% CI) OS duration of 18.3 (11.9-24.7) and 10.3 (7.9-12.7) months, respectively. Furthermore, multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated that PD-1 inhibitor + chemotherapy was independently associated with improved PFS [hazard ratio (HR)=0.308, P=0.002] and OS (HR=0.252, P=0.003). In addition, the incidence of grade 3-5 adverse events (AEs) was relatively low in both groups and the incidence of any grade of each AE was not significantly different between groups (all P>0.050). In conclusion, the first-line PD-1 inhibitor + chemotherapy group had improved efficacy and comparable safety compared with those of the standard treatment in patients with R/M OSCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.