ArticleFrontiers in neurology2024
Patchy profile sign in RAPID software: a specific marker for intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis in acute ischemic stroke.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Identifying the etiology of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) before endovascular treatment (EVT) is important but challenging. In CT perfusion imaging processed by perfusion software, we observed a phenomenon called patchy profile sign (PPS), that is, the hypoperfusion morphology in RAPID software is a discontinuous sheet pattern. This phenomenon is predominantly observed in patients diagnosed with intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS). The study intends to assess whether the PPS can be used to differentiate ICAS from intracranial embolism. Method: Patients with AIS due to M1 segment occlusion of the MCA who underwent mechanical thrombectomy were retrospectively enrolled. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to assess the value of PPS in predicting ICAS. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of the PPS for prediction of ICAS were calculated. Results: A total of 51 patients were included in the study. The PPS was observed in 10 of 19 (52.6%) patients with ICAS, and in 2 of 32 (6.3%) patients with intracranial embolism ( Conclusion: The PPS on RAPID software is an imaging marker with high specificity for ICAS. Larger sample sizes are imperative to validate the findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.