Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38872809›Full record

ArticleNEJM AI2024

Improving Clinician Performance in Classifying EEG Patterns on the Ictal-Interictal Injury Continuum Using Interpretable Machine Learning.

Alina Jade Barnett, Zhicheng Guo, Jin Jing, Wendong Ge, Peter W Kaplan, Wan Yee Kong, Ioannis Karakis, Aline Herlopian, Lakshman Arcot Jayagopal, Olga Taraschenko and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NEJM AI, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Prototype Learning to Create Refined Interpretable Digital Phenotypes from ECGs.Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. ICU-EEG Pattern Detection by a Convolutional Neural Network.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Using artificial intelligence to optimize anti-seizure treatment and EEG-guided decisions in severe brain injury.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Alina Jade BarnettComputer Science, Duke University, Durham, NC.ORCID 0000-0001-8247-4725
Zhicheng GuoPratt School of Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC.ORCID 0000-0003-3510-5358
Jin JingBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.ORCID 0000-0002-2415-5854
Wendong GeBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.ORCID 0000-0003-1557-5336
Peter W KaplanJohns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore.ORCID 0000-0003-0578-7220
Wan Yee KongBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.ORCID 0000-0003-0553-9577
Ioannis KarakisEmory University, Atlanta.ORCID 0000-0001-5122-7211
Aline HerlopianYale University, New Haven, CT.ORCID 0000-0002-0189-7011
Lakshman Arcot JayagopalUniversity of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha.ORCID 0000-0003-1259-0610
Olga TaraschenkoUniversity of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha.ORCID 0000-0003-4848-8909
Olga SelioutskiUniversity of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson.ORCID 0000-0002-5477-527X
Gamaleldin OsmanMayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.ORCID 0000-0002-2231-2473
Daniel GoldenholzBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.ORCID 0000-0002-8370-2758
Cynthia RudinDuke University, Durham, NC.ORCID 0000-0003-4283-2780
M Brandon WestoverBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.ORCID 0000-0003-4803-312X

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
Translational Imaging and Behavioral Assessment (TIBA) CoreP20GM130447 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI Haiying Shen · 2020 to 2026
$20.7M
Data-Driven Sleep Biomarkers of Brain Health, Heart Health, and MortalityR01HL161253 · NHLBI · BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER · PI CLIFFORD, GARI DAVID, MIGNOT, EMMANUEL J · 2022 to 2025
$8.3M
Comparative Safety of Seizure Prophylaxis within the Medicare ProgramR01AG073410 · NIA · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI Lidia Maria Veras Rocha de Moura · 2021 to 2026
$4.1M
Integrative Motor Activity Biomarker for the Risk of Alzheimer's RiskRF1AG064312 · NIA · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI HU, KUN · 2019 to 2019
$3.6M
Multimodal Network Connectivity Architecture (MOCA) of the Brain and its Role in the Recovery of Consciousness in Comatose Cardiac Arrest PatientsR01NS102574 · NINDS · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI GREER, DAVID MATTHEW, WU, ONA · 2018 to 2022
$3.4M
Investigation of Sleep in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU-SLEEP)R01NS102190 · NINDS · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI WESTOVER, MICHAEL BRANDON · 2018 to 2022
$3.2M
Big Data and Deep Learning for the Interictal-Ictal-Injury ContiuumR01NS107291 · NINDS · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI WESTOVER, MICHAEL BRANDON · 2018 to 2022
$2.8M
Establishing a Brain Health Index from the Sleep ElectroencephalogramRF1NS120947 · NINDS · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI CASH, SYDNEY S, THOMAS, ROBERT JOSEPH · 2021 to 2021
$2.4M
Non-Invasive Seizure Forecasting System Using E-Diaries, Internal and External FactorsK23NS124656 · NINDS · BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER · PI Daniel M Goldenholz · 2022 to 2026
$954k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL161253NIA NIH HHS R01 AG073410NIA NIH HHS RF1 AG064312NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM130447NINDS NIH HHS K23 NS124656NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS102190NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS102574NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS107291NINDS NIH HHS RF1 NS120947
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn intensive care units (ICUs), critically ill patients are monitored with electroencephalography (EEG) to prevent serious brain injury. EEG monitoring is constrained by clinician availability, and EEG interpretation can be subjective and prone to interobserver variability. Automated deep-learning systems for EEG could reduce human bias and accelerate the diagnostic process. However, existing uninterpretable (black-box) deep-learning models are untrustworthy, difficult to troubleshoot, and lack accountability in real-world applications, leading to a lack of both trust and adoption by clinicians.

methodsWe developed an interpretable deep-learning system that accurately classifies six patterns of potentially harmful EEG activity - seizure, lateralized periodic discharges (LPDs), generalized periodic discharges (GPDs), lateralized rhythmic delta activity (LRDA), generalized rhythmic delta activity (GRDA), and other patterns - while providing faithful case-based explanations of its predictions. The model was trained on 50,697 total 50-second continuous EEG samples collected from 2711 patients in the ICU between July 2006 and March 2020 at Massachusetts General Hospital. EEG samples were labeled as one of the six EEG patterns by 124 domain experts and trained annotators. To evaluate the model, we asked eight medical professionals with relevant backgrounds to classify 100 EEG samples into the six pattern categories - once with and once without artificial intelligence (AI) assistance - and we assessed the assistive power of this interpretable system by comparing the diagnostic accuracy of the two methods. The model's discriminatory performance was evaluated with area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and area under the precision-recall curve. The model's interpretability was measured with task-specific neighborhood agreement statistics that interrogated the similarities of samples and features. In a separate analysis, the latent space of the neural network was visualized by using dimension reduction techniques to examine whether the ictal-interictal injury continuum hypothesis, which asserts that seizures and seizure-like patterns of brain activity lie along a spectrum, is supported by data.

resultsThe performance of all users significantly improved when provided with AI assistance. Mean user diagnostic accuracy improved from 47 to 71% (P<0.04). The model achieved AUROCs of 0.87, 0.93, 0.96, 0.92, 0.93, and 0.80 for the classes seizure, LPD, GPD, LRDA, GRDA, and other patterns, respectively. This performance was significantly higher than that of a corresponding uninterpretable black-box model (with P<0.0001). Videos traversing the ictal-interictal injury manifold from dimension reduction (a two-dimensional representation of the original high-dimensional feature space) give insight into the layout of EEG patterns within the network's latent space and illuminate relationships between EEG patterns that were previously hypothesized but had not yet been shown explicitly. These results indicate that the ictal-interictal injury continuum hypothesis is supported by data.

conclusionsUsers showed significant pattern classification accuracy improvement with the assistance of this interpretable deep-learning model. The interpretable design facilitates effective human-AI collaboration; this system may improve diagnosis and patient care in clinical settings. The model may also provide a better understanding of how EEG patterns relate to each other along the ictal-interictal injury continuum. (Funded by the National Science Foundation, National Institutes of Health, and others.).

Identifiers

PMID38872809
PMCPMC11175595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.