ArticleNEJM AI2024
Improving Clinician Performance in Classifying EEG Patterns on the Ictal-Interictal Injury Continuum Using Interpretable Machine Learning.
Article in NEJM AI, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed.
- A task-aligned multimodal machine learning framework for studying working memory dysfunction in Parkinson's disease.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2026Article
- Classification of neurodevelopmental disorders and typical development using deep learning and a portable patch-type electroencephalography device.Neuroimage. Reports · 2026Article
- Between Patterns and Predictions: Interpretable Latent EEG Representations for Clinical Insights.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- A scoping review of human-AI collaboration patterns and task divisions in healthcare applications.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Defining the end point of status epilepticus: A scoping review and framework for standardization.Epilepsia · 2026Article
- Identification of nonconvulsive status epilepticus in the ictal-interictal continuum using artificial intelligence: a prospective observational cohort study.Encephalitis (Seoul, Korea) · 2026Article
- Automating Critical Care EEG: Enhancing Accuracy, Efficiency, and Patient Outcomes in Critical Care.Epilepsy currents · 2026Article
- Prototype Learning to Create Refined Interpretable Digital Phenotypes from ECGs.Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing · 2026Article
- Digital Response Test in Epilepsy assesses interictal epileptiform discharge effects in real time.Epilepsia · 2026Article
- Enhancing the prediction of hospital discharge disposition with extraction-based language model classification.npj health systems · 2026Article
- An Automated Classifier of Harmful Brain Activities for Clinical Usage Based on a Vision-Inspired Pre-trained Framework.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- SCOPE-MRI: Bankart Lesion Detection as a Case Study in Data Curation and Deep Learning for Challenging Diagnoses.NPJ artificial intelligence · 2025Article
- ICU-EEG Pattern Detection by a Convolutional Neural Network.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2025Article
- Deep Learning-Based 30-Day Mortality Prediction in Critically Ill Bone and Bone Marrow Metastasis Patients: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Article
- Article
- ProtoECGNet: Case-Based Interpretable Deep Learning for Multi-Label ECG Classification with Contrastive Learning.Proceedings of machine learning research · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Dissociating physiological ripples and epileptiform discharges with vision transformers.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Using artificial intelligence to optimize anti-seizure treatment and EEG-guided decisions in severe brain injury.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn intensive care units (ICUs), critically ill patients are monitored with electroencephalography (EEG) to prevent serious brain injury. EEG monitoring is constrained by clinician availability, and EEG interpretation can be subjective and prone to interobserver variability. Automated deep-learning systems for EEG could reduce human bias and accelerate the diagnostic process. However, existing uninterpretable (black-box) deep-learning models are untrustworthy, difficult to troubleshoot, and lack accountability in real-world applications, leading to a lack of both trust and adoption by clinicians.
methodsWe developed an interpretable deep-learning system that accurately classifies six patterns of potentially harmful EEG activity - seizure, lateralized periodic discharges (LPDs), generalized periodic discharges (GPDs), lateralized rhythmic delta activity (LRDA), generalized rhythmic delta activity (GRDA), and other patterns - while providing faithful case-based explanations of its predictions. The model was trained on 50,697 total 50-second continuous EEG samples collected from 2711 patients in the ICU between July 2006 and March 2020 at Massachusetts General Hospital. EEG samples were labeled as one of the six EEG patterns by 124 domain experts and trained annotators. To evaluate the model, we asked eight medical professionals with relevant backgrounds to classify 100 EEG samples into the six pattern categories - once with and once without artificial intelligence (AI) assistance - and we assessed the assistive power of this interpretable system by comparing the diagnostic accuracy of the two methods. The model's discriminatory performance was evaluated with area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and area under the precision-recall curve. The model's interpretability was measured with task-specific neighborhood agreement statistics that interrogated the similarities of samples and features. In a separate analysis, the latent space of the neural network was visualized by using dimension reduction techniques to examine whether the ictal-interictal injury continuum hypothesis, which asserts that seizures and seizure-like patterns of brain activity lie along a spectrum, is supported by data.
resultsThe performance of all users significantly improved when provided with AI assistance. Mean user diagnostic accuracy improved from 47 to 71% (P<0.04). The model achieved AUROCs of 0.87, 0.93, 0.96, 0.92, 0.93, and 0.80 for the classes seizure, LPD, GPD, LRDA, GRDA, and other patterns, respectively. This performance was significantly higher than that of a corresponding uninterpretable black-box model (with P<0.0001). Videos traversing the ictal-interictal injury manifold from dimension reduction (a two-dimensional representation of the original high-dimensional feature space) give insight into the layout of EEG patterns within the network's latent space and illuminate relationships between EEG patterns that were previously hypothesized but had not yet been shown explicitly. These results indicate that the ictal-interictal injury continuum hypothesis is supported by data.
conclusionsUsers showed significant pattern classification accuracy improvement with the assistance of this interpretable deep-learning model. The interpretable design facilitates effective human-AI collaboration; this system may improve diagnosis and patient care in clinical settings. The model may also provide a better understanding of how EEG patterns relate to each other along the ictal-interictal injury continuum. (Funded by the National Science Foundation, National Institutes of Health, and others.).
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.