Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38872675›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Exploring the Multifactorial Landscape: Risk Factors for Dementia in a Tertiary Care Setting in Thailand.

Kasidid Lawongsa, Supatcha Kengpanich, Patsri Srisuwan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kasidid LawongsaFamily Medicine, Phramongkutklao Hospital, Bangkok, THA.
Supatcha KengpanichFamily Medicine, Phramongkutklao Hospital, Bangkok, THA.
Patsri SrisuwanGeriatrics, Phramongkutklao Hospital, Bangkok, THA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDementia poses a significant public health challenge worldwide, necessitating a deeper understanding of its risk factors to inform preventive strategies.

methodThis retrospective longitudinal study leveraged clinical data from a tertiary care database to investigate the risk factors associated with an incident dementia diagnosis. The study cohort comprised individuals aged 50 years and older. Key variables including age, income, comorbidities such as depressive disorder, osteoporosis, stroke, and metabolic conditions like type 2 diabetes and hypertension were analyzed by using Cox regression analysis.

resultThe study cohort included 127,016 adults 50 years and older. The results revealed that advancing age, with individuals aged 70-79 years having a hazard ratio (HR) of 3.9 (95% confidence interval (CI), 2.6-5.8), and those aged 80 years and above having an HR of 11.6 (95% CI, 7.7-17.3), lower income status (patients with no income or occupation had a notably higher risk of dementia diagnosis, with an HR of 2.0 (95% CI, 1.4-2.8)), depressive disorder (HR of 3.3 (95% CI, 3.3-3.7)), osteoporosis (HR of 1.2 (95% CI, 1.1-1.4)), and stroke (HR of 2.5 (95% CI, 2.3-2.7)) were significantly associated with an increased risk of incident dementia. However, no significant associations were observed for type 2 diabetes, hypertension, obesity, or underweight status managed in tertiary care.

conclusionThe findings underscore the importance of considering a wide range of factors in understanding dementia risk and highlight the potential utility of routinely collected clinical data for comprehensive risk assessment. Further investigation into additional variables and multi-center studies may provide deeper insights into the complex interplay of risk factors contributing to dementia onset.

Indexed as

dementiaelectronic medical recordrisk factorssurvival analysistertiary care

Identifiers

PMID38872675
PMCPMC11170239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.